Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SHAHZAD Azlan A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 29% |
| 2 | WEBER Mattias A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 45% | 7% |
| 3 | NOURELDIN Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 22% |
| 3 | HUANG Tom | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
| 5 | RODRIGUEZ Darlin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 53% |
| 6 | BROU Inkosi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 19% |
| 7 | FORMENTI Giulio | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
| 8 | CHUNG Connor | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 12% | 1% |
| 9 | PIWOWAR Alex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 30% |
| 10 | LIN Maxim | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
| 11 | GOLDMAN Noah R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 47% |
| 12 | PERRON Robert | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
| 13 | BONDARENCO Vlad | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 7% |
| 14 | GONG Jerry | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 21% |
| 15 | HUANG Connor | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 46% | 13% |
| 16 | LAUB William | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 17 | BONSELL Vance | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 50% | 10% |
| 18 | EDELMAN Seth A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 28% |
| 19 | FLUECKIGER Michael | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 20 | SKINNER Graham B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% |
| 21 | ATWOOD Griffin | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 22 | ZHUANG Rayken | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 43% | 8% |
| 23 | MUNGOVAN Matthew | 100% | 98% | 79% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 24 | ARTIS II Ron | 100% | 98% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 25 | KESSLER Josh | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 26 | KESSLER Nathan | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
| 27 | MEYERSON Jacob | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 28 | JAVIDI Michael | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 29 | CHENG Brandon | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 16% | 2% |
| 30 | ELIN Adam E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 6% |
| 31 | TAUER Sam | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 32 | PANNOZZO Luca | 100% | 97% | 79% | 39% | 7% | - | - |
| 33 | COUNTS Nicholas | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 34 | DEKA Tanush | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 35 | KEIPER Benjamin | 100% | 93% | 63% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 36 | ZISLIN Benjamin | 100% | 84% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | RIESTERER Jacob | 100% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | FISHER Paul C. | 100% | 73% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 39 | PEACE Joshua | 100% | 83% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | BROGAN Kevin | 100% | 99% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 41 | CHIN Nigel | 100% | 54% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 42 | ANSARI Umayr | 100% | 79% | 35% | 7% | - | - | - |
| 43 | NWAFOR Muna | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 44 | SOLOMON Alon | 100% | 97% | 72% | 24% | 2% | - | - |
| 45 | WITCZAK Mateus | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 7% | - |
| 46 | DAHL Chris | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
| 46 | MARGIL David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
| 48 | GITELSON David | 100% | 77% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | SABATINI Lucas | 100% | 92% | 61% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 50 | PODDAR Shameek | 100% | 70% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | DOWNEND Aaron | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 52 | GINGERY Julian | 100% | 92% | 61% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
| 53 | FARBER Jake | 100% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 53 | FURLONG Luke | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 55 | BARNATT Benedict | 100% | 96% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 56 | BRUMBAUGH Alex | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.