Ataba Fencing Club - Hartland, WI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | TYLER Syd (Sydney) | - | - | 2% | 20% | 62% | 16% |
2 | KARNAS Karol | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% |
3 | SPINA Joseph | - | - | 2% | 21% | 52% | 24% |
3 | MILLER Lance W. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 25% |
5 | NIKOLOV Peter | - | - | - | 4% | 39% | 57% |
6 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | - | 3% | 18% | 41% | 31% | 7% |
7 | SERAFYM Damian | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% |
8 | RICHARDSON Ray | 2% | 15% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
9 | SWENSON Nikita | 3% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 3% |
10 | BRADFORD Ethan | 28% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
11 | SOBESHKEVYCH Roman | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
12 | RITTERBUSCH Timothy | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 28% | 8% |
13 | BRUNO Enzo | 5% | 28% | 43% | 22% | 2% | - |
14 | KOSS Harrison | 1% | 7% | 31% | 48% | 13% | 1% |
15 | VENKATACHALAM Panav | 1% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% |
16 | WATTANAKIT Anda | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
17 | SAHA Sayan | 1% | 6% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 3% |
18 | CURTY Jack | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
19 | PETERSON Clio | 17% | 54% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
20 | BANSAL Shaurya | - | 10% | 46% | 36% | 8% | - |
21 | MCCORD Jack | - | 5% | 24% | 42% | 27% | 2% |
22 | SHOEMAKER Oliver | 11% | 36% | 38% | 14% | 1% | - |
23 | KOSS Everett | 16% | 42% | 34% | 8% | - | - |
24 | MITCHAM Beaudrae | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
25 | HO Darlene | 4% | 27% | 42% | 23% | 4% | - |
26 | HART Jenna | 60% | 33% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
27 | MCDOWELL Will | < 1% | 15% | 40% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
28 | BETKER Hayden | 7% | 39% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - |
29 | SADLER August | 7% | 40% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - |
30 | RITTERBUSCH Abigail | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.