Durham, NC - Durham, NC, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | GREENBAUM Maxwell H. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 5% |
| 2 | DANNULL Linus N. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 8% |
| 3 | SIMAK Jonathan V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 70% |
| 3 | BENAVRAM Lev C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% | 25% |
| 5 | ALLUM Christopher T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 35% | 4% |
| 6 | LEE Kyle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 58% | 10% |
| 7 | LAHOTSKA Yahor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 24% |
| 8 | WOODWARD Dylan P. | 100% | 99% | 81% | 41% | 10% | 1% |
| 9 | DODRILL Grant | 100% | 99% | 81% | 41% | 10% | 1% |
| 10 | ZHOU Justin | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 20% | 3% |
| 11 | HOFFMAN Skyler E. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 31% | 2% |
| 12 | STONE Jack V. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 9% |
| 13 | CHAMBERS Amir E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 31% |
| 14 | CHANG Eliot A. | 100% | 100% | 88% | 54% | 18% | 2% |
| 15 | BUKOWSKI Bronson | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 13% |
| 16 | CHAVES Matthew J. | 100% | 91% | 39% | 4% | - | - |
| 17 | ROPER Evan C. | 100% | 82% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 18 | DU Gavin J. | 100% | 96% | 54% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 19 | HENSHAW Joseph | 100% | 91% | 54% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 20 | ZHOU Kevin | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 3% |
| 21 | MOORE Evan M. | 100% | 87% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 22 | JIANG Kevin | 100% | 25% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 23 | ANTHONY Silas | 100% | 37% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 24 | COX Luis E. | 100% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.