Event Results
Binghamton University Thanksvember Challenge IIDifficulty Map
Each box shows how difficult an opponent was from the fencer's point of view.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | MEZZO Michael Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 2 | KOLKER Greg Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 3 | LI Benson Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 3 | AMES Kylan | V | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 | |
| 5 | PEDICONE Joseph Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 6 | SIRAGUSA Charlotte Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 6 | CEN Stephanie Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 8 | DIDYCZ Nicholas | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 9 | SZLAVIK Daniel Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 10 | CHARDE Aidan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 11 | WU Margaret Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 12 | BERNSTEIN Aaron | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 | |
| 13 | O'NEILL Nico Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 14 | PETITTI Victor Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 15 | CHENG Thomas Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| Color | Difficulty | Win Probability |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |