Santa Clara Convention Center - Santa Clara, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | TSE Aiden J | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 15% | |
2 | LI Howard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 39% |
3 | ANDRES Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 63% | 19% |
3 | TANI Tino | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 23% | |
5 | NARDINI Nathanael P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 37% | |
6 | KANG Matthew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 16% | |
7 | XIAO Brayden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 18% | 2% |
8 | HWANG Jayden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 31% |
9 | YANG Phillip | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 34% | 6% |
10 | CHEN Cooper | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
11 | HAO Johnny | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% | |
12 | CHAN Henry | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% | |
13 | KOVACHEV Martin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 65% | 24% | 4% | - |
14 | HWANG Hagan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% | |
15 | LI Yidong A. | 100% | 98% | 81% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
16 | RONG Jasper | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 34% | 8% | |
17 | KOVALEV Daniil N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 49% |
18 | YU BOWEN | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 63% | 20% | 2% |
19 | CAO Donald | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
20 | KROON Landon | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 4% | |
21 | XU Yixiao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 63% | |
22 | ZHAO Aidan | 100% | 95% | 65% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
23 | YU Ian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
24 | ARISTOV Ilya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 24% | 4% |
25 | WANG Tiger | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 39% | 8% | |
26 | KANG Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 8% | |
27 | LIU Yijin | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% | |
28 | ANUMULA Aryan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
29 | ZHANG KAIQI | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
30 | IYER Neil | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 32% | 7% | |
31 | TANG Morgan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 10% | |
32 | BRUM Charles E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 16% | |
33 | SLIGAR Jackson | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 31% | 5% | |
33 | CHEN Boaz | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | |
35 | LI Philip | 100% | 92% | 62% | 23% | 3% | - | |
36 | CRICOL Damian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 18% |
37 | KAYDALIN David | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 23% | 4% | - |
38 | LEE Nathan Uju | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 5% | |
39 | IM Tyler | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 8% | |
40 | LIU Daniel | 100% | 93% | 67% | 28% | 6% | - | |
41 | DANG Kainoa | 100% | 90% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - | |
42 | WANG Edward | 100% | 91% | 60% | 21% | 3% | - | |
43 | WONG Hawken | 100% | 100% | 99% | 81% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
43 | LEE Brendan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
45 | LIU Nico | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
45 | DAGUIO Derek | 100% | 88% | 45% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
47 | BAERENWALD Tybalt Wolfram | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
48 | LI Allan | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | |
49 | LIANG Preston | 100% | 93% | 65% | 26% | 4% | - | |
50 | YUEN Caleb | 100% | 91% | 51% | 14% | 2% | - | |
51 | VAN ROY Ray | 100% | 41% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
52 | ZHU Alexander | 100% | 79% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | |
53 | WEI preston | 100% | 79% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | |
54 | YUE Ivan | 100% | 81% | 41% | 11% | 2% | - | |
55 | PARK Emerson | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
56 | LUNDGREN Theo | 100% | 62% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
57 | KANG Alan | 100% | 52% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
58 | WARD Carter | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 29% | 5% | - |
59 | CHEN Brian | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | |
59 | VENKATRAMAN Sushil | 100% | 77% | 34% | 7% | - | - | |
61 | SOULES-ONO Makoa | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
62 | MOORE Greyson | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
63 | FLORES Mateo Pakal | 100% | 54% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
64 | RYU Andrew Junsang | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.