Rain City Super Youth Circuit (SYC)

Youth 10 Men’s Epee (Y10ME)

Friday, April 25, 2025 at 1:00 PM

Register

Rain City Fencing Center - Bellevue, WA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1848 1962 - 1776
5 - 8 1691 1743 - 1667
9 - 16 1600 1718 - 1420
17 - 28 1120 1475 - 658

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Lee, Lucas Yang Fencing Club U 1962 1707.31
2 Wong, Kyle Fortune Fencing U 1871 1615.53
3 Sun, Jiarui (Jerry) Yang Fencing Club E25 1782 1528.33
4 Liu, Yihong Yang Fencing Club U 1776 1522.01
5 Lin, Logan Maximum Fencing Club U 1743 1427.17
6 Fu, Benjamin Yang Fencing Club U 1679 1410.64
7 Tian, Dylan Yang Fencing Club U 1674 1398.85
8 Leung, Joon Maximum Fencing Club U 1667 1378.51
9 Wang, Mason Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 1678 1353.78
10 Nguyen, Norris Maximum Fencing Club U 1650 1337.53
11 Matusow, Brandon Academy Of Fencing Masters (AFM) U 1613 1328.40
12 Li, Kingston Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 1642 1207.35
13 Chi, Zachary Academy Of Fencing Masters (AFM) U 1420 1134.23
14 Reed, Andrew Rain City Fencing Center U 1475 1123.65
15 LIU, YULIN Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 1603 1109.26
16 Purcell, Jonathan Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 1718 983.10
17 Yang, Orsen Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 1475 980.53
18 Lau, Jesse Team Touche Fencing Center U 1331 949.35
19 Li, Jacob Kaizen Academy LLC U 1192 786.68
20 Yu, Rex Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 1447 763.35
21 Dai, Greyson Yang Fencing Club U 1113 632.85
22 Zhang, Jacob Allez Fencing U 966 599.48
23 Wang, Alexander Yang Fencing Club U 1065 565.73
24 Amalo, Caleb Kaizen Academy LLC U 1292 489.92
25 Zhang, William Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 916 279.40
26 Chen, Evan Rain City Fencing Center U 851 82.60
27 Granter, John Alliance Fencing Academy U 658 < 0
28 Chen, Nathan Xingchen U 1135 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!