Rain City Super Youth Circuit (SYC)

Youth 10 Men’s Epee (Y10ME)

Friday, April 25, 2025 at 1:00 PM

Register

Rain City Fencing Center - Bellevue, WA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1801 1927 - 1638
5 - 8 1682 1721 - 1641
9 - 16 1453 1632 - 1163
17 - 28 1094 1462 - 715

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Lee, Lucas Yang Fencing Club U 1927 1667.76
2 Wong, Kyle Fortune Fencing U 1880 1616.40
3 Sun, Jiarui (Jerry) Yang Fencing Club E25 1758 1496.05
4 Liu, Yihong Yang Fencing Club U 1638 1369.20
5 Wang, Mason Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 1721 1356.37
6 Leung, Joon Maximum Fencing Club U 1684 1352.12
7 Nguyen, Norris Maximum Fencing Club U 1682 1351.27
8 Matusow, Brandon Academy Of Fencing Masters (AFM) U 1641 1346.46
9 Fu, Benjamin Yang Fencing Club U 1578 1280.14
10 Tian, Dylan Yang Fencing Club U 1576 1269.27
11 Lin, Logan Maximum Fencing Club U 1563 1172.80
12 Li, Kingston Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 1632 1030.17
13 Chi, Zachary Academy Of Fencing Masters (AFM) U 1281 957.43
14 Reed, Andrew Rain City Fencing Center U 1355 938.37
15 Yang, Orsen Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 1475 935.57
16 Li, Jacob Kaizen Academy LLC U 1163 725.27
17 Yu, Rex Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 1364 648.46
18 Zhang, Jacob Allez Fencing U 1035 624.82
19 Lau, Jesse Team Touche Fencing Center U 1094 522.33
20 Dai, Greyson Yang Fencing Club U 1143 513.96
21 Purcell, Jonathan Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 1462 410.22
22 Wang, Alexander Yang Fencing Club U 1055 366.63
23 Amalo, Caleb Kaizen Academy LLC U 1274 345.28
24 LIU, YULIN Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 1151 314.39
25 Zhang, William Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 916 279.40
26 Granter, John Alliance Fencing Academy U 715 3.67
27 Chen, Evan Rain City Fencing Center U 789 < 0
28 Chen, Nathan Xingchen U 1135 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!