Santa Clara Convention Center - Santa Clara, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KHOO Lauren A. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% |
| 2 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 28% | 68% |
| 3 | SUN Ruoxi | - | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 45% | |
| 3 | KOROL Neta | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 57% |
| 5 | CHEN Chloe I. | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% | |
| 6 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% | |
| 7 | FUNG Emma | - | - | 3% | 20% | 48% | 26% | 3% |
| 8 | CHANG Elizabeth | - | 6% | 35% | 41% | 16% | 2% | |
| 9 | SUN Chien-Yu | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 2% |
| 10 | LUO Sandra J. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 30% | |
| 11 | FERNANDES Thea | - | 1% | 6% | 28% | 46% | 19% | |
| 12 | WELBORN Calissa | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 39% | 15% | 2% |
| 13 | YANG Audrey | - | 6% | 29% | 42% | 20% | 3% | |
| 14 | BEAVER Hannah | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 38% | 15% | 1% |
| 15 | ZHANG Eunice | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 16 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 42% | 18% | |
| 17 | GOOR Viviene E. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 44% | 41% | |
| 18 | SHIH Diane | - | - | - | 6% | 34% | 49% | 10% |
| 19 | LAI Sophia | 1% | 19% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
| 20 | KOROL Dana | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 40% | 11% | |
| 21 | LENK Sophie | 3% | 22% | 44% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 22 | BOLES Amanda X. | 1% | 17% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | |
| 23 | FUNG Vera | - | 3% | 23% | 44% | 26% | 4% | |
| 24 | VO Bao-Vy | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% | |
| 25 | MU Allison | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
| 26 | MANIKTALA Prisha | - | - | 2% | 16% | 39% | 36% | 7% |
| 27 | PENG Serena | - | 7% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 28 | BAIXAULI Carme | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
| 29 | HOBSON Ava | - | 13% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | |
| 30 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | 2% | 18% | 41% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
| 31 | ROLOFF Katarina M. | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 32 | WANG Celine S. | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | QUINN Anna | 7% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 34 | PATTERSON Natalia | 3% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 35 | JEON Emily H. | 38% | 44% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 36 | ZAMELIS Madelyn | 21% | 58% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
| 37 | YANIV Liya | 16% | 47% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | TUAN Sophie | 27% | 43% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 39 | EDWARDS Darby | 5% | 38% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 40 | NIRGUDE Esha | 22% | 49% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 40 | MCKAY Teresa | 64% | 33% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 42 | PIQUETTE Annika | 70% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 43 | BABB Cicely | 89% | 11% | - | - | - | - | |
| 44 | GOEL Riyana | 50% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 45 | DURR Strahlia Devi | 12% | 37% | 37% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.