Santa Clara Convention Center - Santa Clara, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEE REGINA | - | - | - | - | - | 10% | 89% |
| 2 | WANG Ziqi (yoyo) | - | - | - | 3% | 23% | 65% | 9% |
| 3 | YILMAZ Pinar | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 54% |
| 3 | GUO Luxi | - | 2% | 13% | 38% | 37% | 11% | |
| 5 | XU Serena | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 34% | 8% | |
| 6 | LEE Camilla | - | - | 3% | 23% | 51% | 22% | |
| 7 | BEAVER Ava | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 31% | 63% |
| 8 | LEE Yeriel | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 2% |
| 9 | WANG Jessie | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 46% | |
| 10 | LIN Ariel | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 19% | |
| 11 | JIANG Xinchen | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 12 | ABUELFUTUH Sama | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 21% | |
| 13 | WU Jessica | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 36% | 12% | |
| 14 | WANG Victoria | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 43% | 20% | |
| 15 | FISCHBEIN Quinley | 4% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 16 | LEE Emily | 8% | 36% | 38% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 17 | HABEK Sophia | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 26% | |
| 18 | SUN Karolyn | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 6% | |
| 19 | YUNG Bethany | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 20 | LI Yunxuan | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 38% | 20% | 1% |
| 21 | PATTERSON Liliya | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 22 | KWON Genevie | 1% | 7% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% | |
| 23 | BUDMAN Ava | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 31% | 62% |
| 24 | CHIOU-WILLIAMS Matea | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 25 | KANDALA Aanya | 4% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 26 | CHO Dana | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 27 | XU Jessica | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | |
| 28 | GAN Shelby | 5% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 1% | |
| 28 | LIN Isabel | 4% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
| 30 | HE Anna | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 31 | CHO Seren | 4% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 32 | CHANG Allison | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% | |
| 33 | HANKINS Morgan | - | - | 2% | 13% | 42% | 43% | |
| 34 | ZHAO Yanning | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 35 | VIJAY Vaishnavi | 17% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 36 | GARINEY tanvi | 10% | 47% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | RADOV Una | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 38 | DWIGGINS Reese | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 39 | DING Calista | 5% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 6% | - | - |
| 40 | OPERARIO Sofia Francesca | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 41 | TEACHWORTH Samantha | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 1% | |
| 42 | CHEN Julia Z. | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 43 | DENEALE Lucia | 6% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - | |
| 44 | ZHAO Emma | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
| 45 | DYMAR Anna | 1% | 11% | 34% | 39% | 14% | 1% | |
| 46 | YU Chloe | 5% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
| 47 | YAN Ximei (Alicia) | 25% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | XU Chenyu | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 34% | 8% |
| 49 | TISHKOVA-ROBERTS Daria | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 50 | KLEINER Sophia | 22% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 51 | LI Chelsea | 35% | 41% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 52 | MADANNAVAR Trisha | 44% | 42% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 53 | CAYETANO Audrey | 6% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 54 | SIMHADRI Sanjana | 46% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
| 55 | ANEZIOKORO Zahra | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | |
| 56 | YOUSSEF Margaret | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 57 | ARULKUMAR Lashia | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 58 | WANG Nicole | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 1% | - |
| 59 | MIYOSHI Kylie | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 60 | GIERAT-KATZ Izabella | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
| 61 | SUBHASH Neha | 43% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 62 | YU Xintong | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 63 | BEAUCHEMIN Emalie | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | |
| 64 | SRIRAM Jhaanvi | 2% | 22% | 47% | 25% | 4% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.