Santa Clara Convention Center - Santa Clara, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIM William J. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 57% |
| 2 | PI Alexander | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% | |
| 3 | KLEIMAN Jakob | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% | |
| 3 | MIYASAKI-CASTRO Masanobu | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 20% | |
| 5 | BYON Julian | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 5% |
| 6 | LI Yiwei | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 8% |
| 7 | XU Andrew | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 43% |
| 8 | ROSBERG Dashiell W. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 40% | 50% | |
| 9 | ZHU Yuchen (Kevin) | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 32% |
| 10 | RAMANAN Jaisimh | - | - | 5% | 27% | 49% | 18% | |
| 11 | YUN Jake | - | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 73% |
| 12 | MUNGUIA Nathan | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% | |
| 13 | SKARBONKIEWICZ Maksymilian A. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% |
| 14 | RAMTEKKAR Soham | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 15 | LI linze | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 16 | POFF Kainoa | 1% | 9% | 31% | 42% | 16% | 2% | |
| 17 | HWANG Jayden | 4% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 18 | GUFFEY Christopher | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 46% | 23% | |
| 19 | LEE Noah | - | 4% | 15% | 31% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 20 | CHAN Aidan | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 2% |
| 21 | LESUEUR Luke J. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 3% | |
| 22 | ZHAO Zhiyu | 16% | 36% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 23 | CHUA Jared | 16% | 42% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 24 | LUO George F. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 55% | |
| 25 | HAO Anwen | - | - | 3% | 18% | 45% | 34% | |
| 25 | KUMAR Sachit | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 21% | |
| 27 | GOLDIN Lucca | 1% | 10% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
| 28 | KANG Evan | 2% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | - |
| 29 | GAY Jono | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 30 | ZHANG Yupeng | 3% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 1% | |
| 31 | TUNG Ryan | 1% | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 32 | YAP Kah Kai (Cayden) | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 33 | JAIN Aniket | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% |
| 34 | NGUYEN Lomani | 34% | 42% | 19% | 4% | < 1% | - | - |
| 35 | VENKATRAMAN Sudhir | 2% | 16% | 37% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
| 36 | RAMANAN Govind | 1% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% | |
| 37 | WANG Zhuoyi | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 38 | AUTREY Adrien | 29% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | - | |
| 39 | SAMMI Mukul | 7% | 30% | 41% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 39 | KOVALEV Daniil N. | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 7% | |
| 41 | HO Anson | 19% | 46% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | WANG HongXi | 26% | 45% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
| 43 | CHON Collin | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 10% | 2% |
| 44 | GAO Marcus | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | - |
| 44 | BYON Adrian | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
| 46 | FERGUSON Constantine | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 47 | CHEN Lohen | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
| 48 | VUONG Kyle Ka-Him | 5% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 49 | HOLZ Lucas | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | - |
| 50 | NIETO Titus P. | 5% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
| 51 | HERRERA aragon | 13% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 52 | TSAI Michael T. | 4% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
| 53 | ZENG Vito | 18% | 41% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 54 | BENDER Nathan | 40% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 55 | YU Casey | 22% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | HRISTOV Kris | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 57 | YAN Kevin | - | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 58 | JOUFFLINEAU Yohann | 40% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 59 | YANG Si He | 11% | 36% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 60 | SUNG Jeremy | 3% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 61 | SANGSTER Arden | 14% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 62 | GREMILLION Obadiah | 21% | 44% | 29% | 7% | - | - | |
| 62 | CHOI Benjamin | 40% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | |
| 64 | STURGEON Cole | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 65 | WANG Michael | 17% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.