Floyd Little Athletic Center - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MUELLER Emma M. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% |
| 2 | HAFEEZ Hania | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
| 3 | SMUK Daria A. | - | - | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% |
| 3 | SONG Angela | - | - | 5% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 5 | WONG Alexandra R. | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% | |
| 6 | SMITH Grace L. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 21% |
| 7 | LI Zhenni (Jenny) | - | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 8 | GUJJA Misha | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 2% |
| 9 | SMUK Alexandra S. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | |
| 10 | REMEZA Alissa | - | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% |
| 11 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 45% | 30% |
| 12 | LEE Scarlett | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 13 | PALLASVESA Inka | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 9% |
| 14 | PRIHODKO Nina | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 26% | 7% | |
| 15 | SAAL Anna | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 16 | LIN Elaine | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 19% |
| 17 | RICHARDSON Meredith | 1% | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 18 | BLIN Margaux J. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 8% |
| 19 | AZMEH nour | - | - | 7% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 6% |
| 19 | HOPKINS Leila | 1% | 16% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 21 | CANNING Charlotte | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
| 22 | CAFASSO Natalya | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
| 23 | SANTANA Mia | 1% | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 24 | ZHU Serene M. | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 25 | FAN Elizabeth | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 26 | DEPOMMIER Isabelle | 3% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 27 | YOU Isabel B. | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 28 | LONADIER Keira | - | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 19% |
| 29 | LI Fei | 1% | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 30 | ABRAMSON Mariela R. | - | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 31 | BENZAN India | - | 2% | 31% | 42% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 32 | BALSKUS Sophia | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | |
| 33 | SATO Elyse | 69% | 29% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 34 | CONNOLLY Natasha | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 35 | CARNEY Amelia | 17% | 60% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 36 | ANAR Yesugen | 11% | 80% | 9% | - | - | - | - |
| 37 | XU Priscilla | 51% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 38 | BUES Clarissa | 11% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
| 39 | SANLIKOL Suzan | 40% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
| 40 | ANAR Yesui | 75% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 41 | BUES Caelan | 88% | 12% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.