Battle in Space RYC/RJCC

Cadet Men’s Foil (CDTMF)

Sunday, April 20, 2025 at 8:00 AM

Register

University of Houston - Campus Recreation and Wellness Center - Houston, TX

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2435 2583 - 2177
5 - 8 1926 2050 - 1847
9 - 16 1719 1885 - 1436
17 - 23 1134 1384 - 753

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Raj, Jay Space City Fencing Academy B25 2583 2323.65
2 Elkousy, Zain al Din Space City Fencing Academy B25 2528 2268.89
3 Chen, Anson Fencing Institute Of Texas B24 2177 1906.73
4 Yuan, Zhihe Space City Fencing Academy U 2452 1745.94
5 Gafford, Roman Bayou City Fencing Academy E25 2050 1704.28
6 McKee, Calvin Fencing Institute Of Texas D25 1935 1668.11
7 Teh, Tang-Ngu Space City Fencing Academy C25 1873 1593.62
8 Cheng, Mason Fencing Institute Of Texas D25 1847 1563.35
9 Jin, Xueyuan George Space City Fencing Academy E23 1798 1537.39
10 Nuckles, Caden Space City Fencing Academy D25 1855 1523.04
11 Jin, Xuechong Daniel Space City Fencing Academy E24 1780 1515.50
12 Halim, Seif Space City Fencing Academy E24 1885 1499.79
13 Popokh, Luca Fencing Institute Of Texas E24 1721 1436.98
14 ZHENG, GREGORY Space City Fencing Academy E24 1797 1263.53
15 Lam, Kirin Space City Fencing Academy E25 1479 1173.99
16 sukkala, Avaneesh Fort Bend Fencing Academy U 1436 799.62
17 Dai, Calvin Space City Fencing Academy U 1384 739.76
18 Francis, Sebastian Space City Fencing Academy E25 1252 727.84
19 Dimino, Kartik Space City Fencing Academy U 1073 625.82
20 Verdejo-Buisson, Nicolas Salle De Long Fencers U 1249 521.06
21 Lin, Evan Space City Fencing Academy U 1039 517.89
22 Lukasik, Michael Salle De Long Fencers U 1190 447.01
23 Francis, Maximillian Space City Fencing Academy E24 753 12.81

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!