Floyd Little Athletic Center - New Haven, CT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | WANG Amabel | D V V V V | V V V V V | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 2 | HARRIS Julia | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 3 | KAPRAN Anastasia | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 3 | WANG Joanna | D V V V V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 5 | ZELDIN Nadia | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
| 6 | LI Han (Helina) | V V D V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 7 | TSIMIKLIS aphrodite | V V V V D | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 8 | CAI Ilana | V V V D V D | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 9 | CASCONE Sophie | V V V V D V | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 10 | FIELD Elizabeth | V V D V V | V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
| 11 | BING Charlotte | V V V D V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 12 | LI Savannah | V V V D D V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 13 | LIU Caydence | V D D V V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 14 | LI Beryl | D V D V V | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 15 | REZA Fukaina | V D V D V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 16 | YIN Chloe | V V D V D | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 17 | LIN Yunong | V D V D V V | D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 18 | AGUIAR Leala | V D V D V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 19 | WANG Selina | D D V V V | D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
| 20 | JUNCADELLA Lucy | V D D V V | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 21 | MACKINTOSH Quinn | V D V V D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 22 | KIM Claire | V D D V V D | D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
| 23 | JIN Sophie | D D V D V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 24 | DE CASTRO Kai | V V D D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 25 | PEDERSEN Clara | D V D V D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 26 | NEWMAN-GILLIGAN Callahan | D V V D D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 27 | ZAHRAN Emily | D D V D V D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 28 | SHANG Arianna | D V D D D V | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 29 | HUANG Sophie | D D V D D | V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 30 | ROBERTS Anastasia | D V D D D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 31 | LIU Jenna | D D V D D D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 32 | ZHANG Zoey | D D D D D D | V D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
| 33 | TAVARES Olivia | D D D V D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 34 | ZHANG Caroline | D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
| 35 | CHOI Cara | D D D D D | D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
| 36 | BO Iris | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 37 | CHEN Catherine | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 38 | VOROS Madeleine | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.