Battle in Space RYC/RJCC

Youth 14 Men’s Saber (Y14MS)

Saturday, April 19, 2025 at 12:00 PM

Register

University of Houston - Campus Recreation and Wellness Center - Houston, TX

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1664 1837 - 1573
5 - 8 1518 1692 - 1423
9 - 16 1196 1437 - 954
17 - 25 1053 1634 - 661

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Meade, Liam Texas Sabre Academy D24 1837 1561.10
2 Lu, Simon Lone Star Fencing Center U 1673 1363.38
3 Zhang, Caleb Globus Fencing Academy U 1573 1255.30
4 Shankar, Rahm Sabio Fencing Academy E25 1574 1230.66
5 Kuang, Cyrus Globus Fencing Academy U 1692 1181.07
6 Dixon, Allan Globus Fencing Academy U 1494 1041.59
7 Woster, Matthew Texas Sabre Academy E25 1464 1024.99
8 Sra, Nawab Sabio Fencing Academy U 1423 755.99
9 Kondogi, Saivarun Sabio Fencing Academy U 1290 702.41
10 Parikh, Saavn Frisco Fencing Academy U 1275 702.23
11 Cai, Limo Texas Sabre Academy U 1437 587.30
12 Korivi, Ishan Frisco Fencing Academy U 1277 573.90
13 Kang, Jayden Sabio Fencing Academy U 1274 536.76
14 Huang, Keon Lone Star Fencing Center U 1025 363.00
15 Yu, Hyunseung Globus Fencing Academy U 1035 327.70
16 Kang, Nathan Lone Star Fencing Center U 954 314.27
17 Liu, Andy Globus Fencing Academy U 1064 312.97
18 Balagopal, Aditya Frisco Fencing Academy U 916 220.92
19 GENG, XINGZHI U 1634 210.55
20 Bhadlikar, Shaunak Globus Fencing Academy U 1007 106.56
21 Berube, Rush Globus Fencing Academy U 978 97.52
22 Rangel Santana, Diego Round Rock Fencing Club, LLC U 1381 90.97
23 Chidambaram, Nivedh Sabio Fencing Academy U 661 62.05
24 Abraham, Steve E Frisco Fencing Academy U 799 < 0
25 Silla, Suvan Veer Frisco Fencing Academy U 1035 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!