Floyd Little Athletic Center - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SHOMAN Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 19% |
| 2 | DENG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 33% | |
| 3 | BABAYEV Gabriel A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% | |
| 3 | KIM Shaun M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 44% |
| 5 | MARGULIES William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% |
| 6 | SLASTIN Andrew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 18% | |
| 7 | KIM-COGAN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 13% |
| 8 | MAKLIN Edward P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 22% |
| 9 | TONG ZACHARY | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 37% |
| 10 | MICLAUS Justin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 32% | |
| 11 | KWALWASSER Eric | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 18% | |
| 12 | FIELDS Matthew S. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 34% | 5% | |
| 13 | WAXLER Seth B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 16% |
| 14 | SKINNER Graham B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 20% |
| 15 | SHTEYN Mark | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 48% | 18% | 3% |
| 16 | KASPER Aaron | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% | |
| 17 | BAE Jason I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 32% |
| 18 | SHOMAN Noah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% | |
| 19 | SHAHZAD Azlan A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 68% | 26% | 3% |
| 20 | ZHENG Edward L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 27% |
| 21 | HAN Daniel Y. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 24% | 4% |
| 22 | LO Alexander | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 18% | |
| 23 | PANDEY Neil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% | 16% |
| 24 | KOGAN Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 34% |
| 25 | ZENG Noah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 13% |
| 26 | WEBER Mattias A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 32% | 6% |
| 27 | CHTERENTAL Alex | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% | 4% |
| 28 | MYLEK Peter | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 46% | 16% | 3% |
| 29 | TASIKAS Stylianos | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 30 | DOWNEY Baran | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 2% | |
| 31 | EYBELMAN Ariel | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 15% | 1% | |
| 32 | KUSHKOV Daniel | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 27% | 4% | |
| 33 | GINSBERG Jordan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 34 | TENG Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% | 12% |
| 35 | HUANG Connor | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% |
| 36 | PIWOWAR Alex | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 9% | |
| 37 | PENG Bryan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 7% | |
| 38 | KESSLER Josh | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 39 | KESSLER Nathan | 100% | 99% | 86% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 39 | BROOK Joel | 100% | 97% | 78% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 39 | CHUNG Connor | 100% | 99% | 84% | 46% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 42 | GONG Jerry | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 28% | 5% | |
| 43 | FRANCOIS Alexander C. | 100% | 87% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 43 | TSAO Oliver | 100% | 83% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 45 | DEPEW Spencer | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% | |
| 46 | KUSHKOV Veniamin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 13% | |
| 47 | BONDARENCO Vlad | 100% | 98% | 80% | 39% | 9% | 1% | |
| 48 | SUGIURA Samuel | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 25% | 4% | |
| 49 | HUROWITZ Max | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 12% | 1% | |
| 50 | SHIRPAL Oleksandr | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 60% | 16% |
| 51 | LEE Andrew | 100% | 87% | 48% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 52 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% | |
| 53 | DOLAN Charles R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% | 4% |
| 54 | DIMATTEO Michael | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 55 | MATTOO Surya | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 55 | HOPPA Luke H. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 18% | 3% |
| 57 | KATZ Ryan | 100% | 97% | 77% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 58 | HUANG Alexander C. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 27% | 4% | |
| 58 | BROU Inkosi | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 19% | 2% | |
| 60 | KEIPER Benjamin | 100% | 58% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 61 | SMINK Oliver | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 26% | 4% | - |
| 62 | LIU Kevin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
| 63 | ELIN Adam E. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 64 | MUNGOVAN Matthew | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 65 | SMITH Vaughn | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 66 | WANG daniel | 100% | 95% | 74% | 41% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 67 | PEACE Joshua | 100% | 71% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 68 | WITCZAK Mateus | 100% | 99% | 88% | 40% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 69 | XU Justin | 100% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 70 | LIN Philip T. | 100% | 83% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 71 | NGUYEN Anthony | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 72 | SEN Christian | 100% | 78% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 73 | CUSUMANO Neal | 100% | 73% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 74 | LAUB William | 100% | 95% | 70% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 75 | JIN David | 100% | 78% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 76 | MOULTON Ian | 100% | 91% | 56% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 77 | PERRON Robert | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 16% | 1% | |
| 78 | FREDRICK Jameer | 100% | 86% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 79 | BADUSHOV Anton | 100% | 90% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 80 | BRANDOFINO James M. | 100% | 92% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 81 | DEKA Tanush | 100% | 100% | 98% | 76% | 28% | 4% | - |
| 82 | MAO Jeremy | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 83 | RYAN Kai | 100% | 80% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 84 | YOSHEA Henry | 100% | 56% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 85 | RAGAN STEINSSON Sigurdur | 100% | 63% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 86 | HO Jacob | 100% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 87 | SHELMIDINE Cole | 100% | 64% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 88 | DESAUTELS Connor | 100% | 50% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 89 | BOULAIS Andrew D. | 100% | 76% | 37% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 90 | KMETA-SUAREZ Graysen | 100% | 37% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 91 | TSAO Alister | 100% | 42% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 92 | DOWNEND Aaron | 100% | 52% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.