DC Fencers Club - Silver Spring, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SINGH Ravin | - | - | 3% | 27% | 51% | 18% | |
2 | ALI Farhan | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 41% | 13% | |
3 | DAN Rex | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 14% | 1% |
3 | GANTSOUDES Isaac | - | 1% | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% |
5 | LEE DoWon | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 14% | 1% |
6 | PILSON Rebecca | 1% | 10% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
7 | BUI Ryan | - | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
8 | ROINIOTIS Theodore | 1% | 11% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
9 | LE BORGNE Matthieu | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 14% |
10 | SOKOL Luke | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 31% | 10% |
11 | LIN Haley | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 39% | 30% | 6% |
12 | VICKERMAN Aspen | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
13 | SODANI Luke | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
14 | LEE Gloria | 10% | 36% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - | |
15 | BARKMAN Hudson | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
16 | ILYAS Ayah | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 2% |
17 | KANG Yenna | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 20% |
18 | WANG Aiden | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
19 | BENNETT Pierce | 28% | 44% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
20 | SZIEDE Kieran | 10% | 37% | 40% | 13% | 1% | - | |
21 | PENG Yue | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
22 | STERLING Henry | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% | |
23 | PETERSON Christopher | 1% | 10% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
24 | DOAN Christopher | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
25 | CHAMBERS Ryan | 16% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
26 | LEE Benjamin | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% | - |
27 | JEYOON Lauren | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.