The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Take Action

AFM Div1A ROC

Div I-A Men's Saber

Saturday, September 7, 2019 at 4:00 PM

Sunnyvale, CA - Sunnyvale, CA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Birth Year

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

#	Name	Number of victories
#	Name	0	1	2	3	4	5	6
1	KWONG Samuel J.	-	-	1%	12%	41%	46%
2	FLORES Gerardo (Gerardito) D.	-	-	1%	13%	42%	43%
3	OSTER Keegan J.	-	1%	10%	30%	40%	18%
3	HU William	-	1%	12%	36%	38%	13%
5	CAPPELLUTI Ryan M.	-	5%	20%	36%	30%	9%
6	DHINGRA Gian K.	-	2%	13%	37%	38%	11%
7	ZHOU Matthew R.	-	1%	5%	19%	35%	31%	10%
8	YOUNG Nash	-	2%	12%	33%	38%	15%
9	DEMAREST Iain	-	-	7%	29%	43%	21%
10	KIM Benjamin H.	1%	11%	34%	37%	15%	2%
11	KIM Andrew H.	-	4%	33%	41%	19%	3%
12	FALLICK Ozzie	-	3%	14%	30%	32%	17%	3%
13	SOHN Kevin J.	-	1%	11%	35%	39%	14%
14	BALDAUF Frederick (Fritz) P.	5%	27%	39%	23%	6%	1%
15	MARSEE James	-	-	2%	13%	33%	37%	15%
16	TANN Justin	8%	28%	36%	21%	6%	1%	-
17	KOUNALAKIS Antoneo T.	-	-	5%	21%	37%	29%	8%
18	LIMB Matthew G.	-	-	4%	17%	34%	32%	11%
19	YANG Ziyi	-	4%	20%	41%	30%	6%
20	KHAVANDI Soheil	-	2%	9%	26%	35%	23%	6%
21	LIU David J.	4%	21%	37%	28%	10%	1%
22	IWAMOTO Eric Y.	-	1%	11%	35%	41%	12%
23	CHEN Howard	-	1%	9%	28%	40%	22%
24	PORTMANN Stein J.	1%	21%	42%	29%	7%	-
25	RIGGINS Littleton K.	1%	9%	29%	37%	20%	4%
26	FLORES Peter D.	3%	19%	36%	29%	11%	2%	-
26	TANG Alex Y.	1%	7%	24%	35%	24%	8%	1%
28	PROCHAZKA Archer R.	26%	51%	20%	3%	-	-	-
29	COVINGTON Max G.	1%	9%	30%	36%	20%	5%	-
30	BERGER Oliver	4%	21%	37%	28%	9%	1%
31	LI Joshua L.	3%	21%	44%	26%	5%	-
32	SINGER Carson	1%	10%	29%	36%	20%	4%
33	TRINH Trevor Z.	-	2%	11%	28%	35%	20%	5%
34	RAJA Arnav	1%	14%	35%	34%	14%	2%
35	GRIFFIN Nicholas D.	2%	24%	42%	26%	6%	-
36	TAN Darren	38%	44%	15%	2%	-	-
37	MARTINEZ Mario D.	23%	61%	15%	1%	-	-
38	SHI Kyle	76%	21%	2%	-	-	-
38	XU William	36%	41%	19%	4%	-	-
40	STONE Esmond A.	18%	38%	30%	11%	2%	-	-
41	LEUNG Nathan	58%	34%	7%	1%	-	-
41	ROSENQUEST Nils	64%	33%	3%	-	-	-
41	PATEL Yash	20%	45%	28%	7%	1%	-
44	KOZHUHAROV Ivaylo	22%	41%	28%	8%	1%	-	-

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

Each cell in a fencer's row corresponds to a specific number of victories, starting from the left with no victories and increasing to the right, indicating victories in all bouts.
The shading of each cell represents the probability of that particular victory outcome for the fencer. Darker shades indicate higher probabilities, suggesting that the outcome is more likely based on past performances. On the other hand, lighter shades point towards less probable outcomes.
The boxed number in a cell represents the actual number of victories the fencer achieved in the pool, making it easy to compare predicted probabilities with actual outcomes at a glance.
By examining the gradient from lighter to darker cells, you can get an intuitive sense of where a fencer's victories are more or less expected based on their historical performance.

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.

Want to keep up with all things fencingtracker? Join our Discord community here.