Sunnyvale, CA - Sunnyvale, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHENG Evelyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% |
| 2 | YANKOVSKIY Anastasia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 36% |
| 3 | LEE Alina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% |
| 3 | PETROVA Kristina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% |
| 5 | KNIGHT Skylar | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 26% |
| 6 | ZAROFF Roxanne | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 22% |
| 7 | LI Phoebe J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 16% |
| 8 | KONG Chin-Yi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
| 9 | LAU Sydnee M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 17% |
| 10 | ALTEN Ayaka | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
| 11 | BHATT Morgane | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
| 12 | CHO Gracie L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
| 13 | QIAN Crystal | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 18% |
| 14 | CAO Arianna L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 19% |
| 15 | YU Seneca | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
| 16 | RAMAN Tanvi | 100% | 89% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 17 | LEE Brianna J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 21% |
| 18 | YHIP Mikaela M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 11% | 1% |
| 19 | ZHANG Sylvia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 8% |
| 20 | SHIH Diane | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 21 | FERNANDES Thea | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 22 | KONG Olivia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 27% | 5% |
| 23 | JO Mia C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
| 24 | IBEN Claire L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 3% |
| 25 | LEE Bethanie | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 26 | YAMAGUCHI Kate M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 39% | 7% |
| 27 | YEH Marissa E. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 28 | XU Marie-Anne J. | 100% | 92% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 29 | UYANIK Nerine | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 11% | 1% |
| 30 | LOW Sharon J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 4% |
| 31 | KHOO Lauren A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 32 | HO Rachel E. | 100% | 90% | 60% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 33 | THOMAS Aaria S. | 100% | 98% | 74% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 34 | OH Erin H. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 35 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 36 | LEE Isabelle | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 37 | TRAN Ava D. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 38 | PRIETO Sofia M. | 100% | 94% | 68% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 39 | TONG Ophelia | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 40 | VOHRA Anusha | 100% | 93% | 63% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 41 | SULEIMAN Alysa J. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 42 | SUN Chien-Yu | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 43 | KOROL Dana | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 44 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | 100% | 95% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 45 | KOROL Neta | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 46 | LAU Chloe M. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 47 | YIN Helen | 100% | 94% | 63% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 48 | KIM Hyunchae Y. | 100% | 82% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 49 | HSIUNG Samantha | 100% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 50 | YOUNG Audrey S. | 100% | 95% | 39% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | HOBSON Leena | 100% | 78% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | LIN Joyce | 100% | 62% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 53 | DOBRINEN Elizabeth | 100% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 54 | CUI Melody J. | 100% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 55 | WILEY Erica | 100% | 11% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 56 | UMAP Arna | 100% | 85% | 50% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.