BBFC Duel in the Desert SYC, RCC & Y8

Youth 8 Men’s Foil (Y8MF)

Saturday, May 3, 2025 at 3:00 PM

Register

Rio Hotel and Casino - Las Vegas, NV

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1666 1763 - 1587
5 - 8 1449 1572 - 1331
9 - 16 1212 1404 - 958
17 - 28 1184 2500 - 677

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Huang, Owen SoCAL Fencing Center U 1763 1485.76
2 Zhang, William Team Touche Fencing Center U 1712 1425.52
3 Tardiff, Owen Tim Morehouse Fencing Club (Port Chester) U 1600 1301.14
4 Xu, Daniel SoCAL Fencing Center U 1587 1225.23
5 Xia, Wenhao Star Fencing Academy U 1572 1191.53
6 Yin, Luke SoCAL Fencing Center U 1442 1059.70
7 Chang, Owen Precision Athletics Fencing Club U 1451 1052.54
8 Li, Mason Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1331 1038.40
9 Tikhonov, Aleksandr Bay Area Fencing Club U 1378 1000.81
10 Bagwell, Theodore SoCAL Fencing Center U 1228 828.13
11 zhang, alex SoCAL Fencing Center U 1152 791.15
12 Wang, Theodore Maximum Fencing Club U 1252 739.61
13 Zeng, Cayden Bay Area Fencing Club U 1121 683.11
14 Lin, Evan SoCAL Fencing Center U 1204 647.82
15 Li, Ethan Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 958 578.66
16 Jones, Zane Bluegrass Fencers' Club U 1404 546.27
17 Wu, William SoCAL Fencing Center U 1197 528.42
18 An, Graham Eminence Fencing Academy U 1363 482.07
19 Lee, Elliot United Fencing Academy U 1096 399.65
20 Leung, Jackson U 1543 309.00
21 Gao, Ethan SoCAL Fencing Center U 1079 219.22
22 Brod, Baylin Space City Fencing Academy U 677 81.71
23 Sasomsup, Kaison United Fencing Academy U 2500 < 0
24 Lu, Jason Medeo Fencing Club U 720 < 0
25 Liu, Jordan Golubitsky Fencing Center U 993 < 0
26 Vasylyshyn, Vadym Eminence Fencing Academy U 1248 < 0
27 Nacu, Andre U 1013 < 0
28 Meng, Daniel Golubitsky Fencing Center U 783 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!