Wang Memorial ROC/RYC/RJCC

Youth 12 Men’s Saber (Y12MS)

Sunday, March 30, 2025 at 11:00 AM

Register

Dallas Market Center MAIN HALL - Dallas, TX

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2030 2325 - 1847
5 - 8 1571 1818 - 1322
9 - 16 1283 1392 - 1153
17 - 27 1020 1562 - 429

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 YU, BOWEN Lone Star Fencing Center D24 2325 2071.55
2 Yu, Ian Lone Star Fencing Center U 2084 1828.47
3 Lu, Simon Lone Star Fencing Center U 1866 1605.77
4 Kuang, Cyrus Globus Fencing Academy U 1847 1557.54
5 Shankar, Rahm Sabio Fencing Academy U 1818 1551.99
6 Zhang, Caleb Globus Fencing Academy U 1692 1428.83
7 Oh, Caleb Globus Fencing Academy U 1452 1111.95
8 Guo, Aiden Globus Fencing Academy U 1322 980.26
9 Liu, Dylan Globus Fencing Academy U 1375 949.57
10 Korivi, Ishan Frisco Fencing Academy U 1392 884.63
11 Cai, Limo Texas Sabre Academy U 1374 863.51
12 Scott, Clark Globus Fencing Academy U 1263 796.40
13 Kim, Dylan Globus Fencing Academy U 1244 739.20
14 Kim, Christopher Sabio Fencing Academy U 1285 733.58
15 Thotakura, Sreyas Frisco Fencing Academy U 1153 678.11
16 Liu, Andy Globus Fencing Academy U 1179 671.51
17 Nakamura, Haruki Globus Fencing Academy U 1289 656.29
18 Chidambaram, Nivedh Sabio Fencing Academy U 1017 613.21
19 Balagopal, Aditya Frisco Fencing Academy U 1085 593.80
20 Jain, Aarambh Sabio Fencing Academy U 1068 539.66
21 Yu, Hyunseung Globus Fencing Academy U 1105 511.55
22 Kang, Nathan Lone Star Fencing Center U 998 470.20
23 Qiu, Lucas Globus Fencing Academy U 977 392.89
24 Han, Roman U 1562 219.00
25 Park, Seojun Globus Fencing Academy U 1002 105.26
26 Yu, Huibin Lone Star Fencing Center U 691 < 0
27 Grover, Sebastian Globus Fencing Academy U 429 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!