Wang Memorial ROC/RYC/RJCC

Junior Men’s Foil (JNRMF)

Saturday, March 29, 2025 at 2:00 PM

Register

Dallas Market Center MAIN HALL - Dallas, TX

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2528 2728 - 2362
5 - 8 2177 2318 - 2071
9 - 16 1940 2097 - 1839
17 - 26 1264 1721 - 753

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Dore, Davis University of Incarnate Word Fencing NCAA B24 2728 2422.77
2 Raj, Jay Space City Fencing Academy C25 2583 2323.65
3 Andric, Borna Space City Fencing Academy B24 2439 2179.40
4 McKinley, Luke University of Incarnate Word Fencing NCAA C24 2362 2055.11
5 Johnson, Chance Salle De Long Fencers C24 2318 2007.50
6 Chen, Anson Fencing Institute Of Texas B24 2177 1906.73
7 Clark, Benjamin Space City Fencing Academy C24 2142 1870.87
8 Barrett, Austin Space City Fencing Academy C24 2071 1812.63
9 Sanchez, Emanuel University of Incarnate Word Fencing NCAA C24 2097 1783.56
10 Giddens, James Fairfield Avenue School of Fencing D24 2062 1683.88
11 Chew, Aaron Fort Bend Fencing Academy D24 2008 1682.51
12 McKee, Calvin Fencing Institute Of Texas D24 1935 1668.11
13 Teh, Tang-Ngu Space City Fencing Academy C25 1873 1593.62
14 Cheng, Mason Fencing Institute Of Texas D25 1847 1563.35
15 Flynt, Hayden Salle De Long Fencers D24 1859 1542.96
16 Chen, Kelton Fencing Institute Of Texas E24 1839 1504.05
17 Popokh, Luca Fencing Institute Of Texas E24 1721 1436.98
18 Lam, Kirin Space City Fencing Academy E25 1479 1173.99
19 Dai, Calvin Space City Fencing Academy U 1384 739.76
20 Francis, Sebastian Space City Fencing Academy E25 1252 727.84
21 Lin, Evan Space City Fencing Academy U 1039 517.89
22 Lukasik, Michael Salle De Long Fencers U 1190 447.01
23 Jacobs, Jack Tulsa Fencing Club U 1466 445.63
24 Francis, Maximillian Space City Fencing Academy E24 753 12.81
25 Hollins, Noah Arkansas Fencing Academy U 1441 < 0
26 Schmidt, Robert Caddo Magnet Fencing Club U 913 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!