Event Results
Miami University Love and Honor 3-Weapon OpenDifficulty Map
Each box shows how difficult an opponent was from the fencer's point of view.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LI Jesse | V V | V V | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 2 | CHAN Matthew | V V | V V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 3 | MCNICHOLAS Evan | V V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 3 | BARTCH Ethan | V D | V V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 5 | AGUILAR Nicolas F. | D V | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 6 | MOHR Aaron Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 7 | WU Angel Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 8 | PACK Josh | D D | V D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
| 9 | HABEGGER Alexander | V D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 10 | WANG Elliott | D D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 | |
| 11 | BENEDETTI Connor Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 12 | HENDRIX Quinten Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 13 | KING Elizabeth | D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
| 14 | DENIHAN Jack Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 15 | KELLY Olivia Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| Color | Difficulty | Win Probability |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |