COZMX RYC/RCC

Youth 12 Men’s Saber (Y12MS)

Sunday, March 16, 2025 at 8:00 AM

Register

San Joaquin County Fairgrounds - Stockton, CA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1920 2100 - 1734
5 - 8 1650 1769 - 1495
9 - 16 1406 1746 - 1120
17 - 27 1625 2500 - 886

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Tang, Morgan Halberstadt Fencers' Club E24 2100 1836.43
2 Hristov, Nickolas Premier Fencing Academy U 2041 1738.44
3 Fischer, Noel Las Vegas Fencing Academy U 1806 1448.79
4 Wang, David Avant Garde Fencers Club, Inc (CA) (AGFC) U 1734 1434.77
5 Duff, Michael The Fencing Center U 1692 1399.87
6 Ho, Alden Premier Fencing Academy U 1769 1394.55
7 Luo, Gavin The Fencing Center U 1646 1351.83
8 Tan, Daniel The Fencing Center U 1495 1136.14
9 Lee, Kyle Sung Ju Premier Fencing Academy U 1602 1080.90
10 Ramakrishna, Arjun The Fencing Center U 1746 915.34
11 Masaki, Alex Premier Fencing Academy U 1573 830.48
12 Belhe, Hridhaan Cardinal Fencing Club U 1287 826.08
13 Irvine, Cooper The Fencing Center U 1279 789.94
14 Zhang, Hanzhi The Fencing Center U 1120 717.43
15 Elsayed, Omar Halberstadt Fencers' Club U 1486 448.81
16 Chang, William Sacramento Saber Fencing LLC U 1153 396.14
17 Mallard, Arthur Cardinal Fencing Club U 964 378.81
18 Black, Conall San Francisco Sabre School U 1723 350.22
19 Kim, Connor Maximum Fencing Club U 904 255.22
20 Ferring, Theo Cardinal Fencing Club U 1760 172.41
21 Bodo, John Maximum Fencing Club U 1259 161.90
22 Lin, Rongcheng Noah Bay Area Fencing Club U 886 112.56
23 Chew, Marcus Cardinal Fencing Club U 2500 < 0
24 Liu, Franklin Maximum Fencing Club U 2500 < 0
25 Walsh, Charlie San Francisco Sabre School U 2500 < 0
26 Douglas, Milo Cardinal Fencing Club U 1103 < 0
27 Ellis, Jackson Sacramento Saber Fencing LLC U 1776 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!