SportsPlex at Metuchen - Metuchen, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ZHENG Julie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 39% | |
2 | KIM Rachael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% |
3 | MI Anning | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 29% | |
3 | SHIM Grace J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 35% | |
5 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 40% | |
6 | ROY Layla | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 50% |
7 | GU EMILY | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 12% |
8 | SIMONOV Dasha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 12% |
9 | HECKMANN Emma | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 74% |
10 | MI Aileen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% |
11 | ASCHETTINO Aurora | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% | 15% |
12 | YANG Lingting | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 11% |
13 | MEYER Claudia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 41% | 8% | |
14 | YURKOVA Mariia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 15% | |
15 | WANG Jasmine | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 14% | |
16 | RASO Olivia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% | 3% |
17 | ZHANG Selena | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
18 | GANDLURI Sreehitha | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 36% | 6% | - |
19 | CHOW Annabelle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 31% | |
20 | CHARALEL Jessica | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 38% | 6% | |
21 | WANG Yudi | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
22 | FIELD Julianna | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
23 | CHENG Isa | 100% | 90% | 52% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
24 | LI Eleanor | 100% | 93% | 61% | 21% | 3% | - | |
25 | LIN Victoria T. | 100% | 100% | 89% | 52% | 13% | 1% | |
26 | UNGERER Frieda | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 23% | 3% |
27 | PARK Caitlyn | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 8% | - |
28 | KULKARNI Sohah A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 42% | 9% |
29 | WANG Chloe | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 47% | 11% | |
30 | NEUMAN Sophie | 100% | 99% | 84% | 45% | 11% | 1% | |
31 | LEE emily | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% | 9% | 1% | |
32 | YU Jane | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 29% | 3% | - |
33 | DIPAOLO Julia | 100% | 97% | 72% | 28% | 5% | - | |
34 | PARK Jacqueline | 100% | 94% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - | |
35 | ROZPEDOWSKI Claire | 100% | 97% | 73% | 26% | 4% | - | - |
36 | PAULUS Isabella | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% | 9% | - |
37 | LIU Long | 100% | 88% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
37 | KAPOOR Saanvi | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - |
39 | BENNETT Abigail | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
40 | CHAKRAPANI Ila | 100% | 66% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
41 | TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Marisol | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - |
42 | SHI Sasha | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
43 | SA Milla | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
44 | LAPPER Whitney P. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 13% | 1% | - |
45 | HUNT Abigail S. | 100% | 97% | 73% | 29% | 5% | - | |
46 | DUNCAN Kennedy | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 2% | |
47 | WANG Reese | 100% | 94% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | |
48 | LOPEZ Seble | 100% | 47% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
49 | SNYDERS Evelyn | 100% | 62% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
50 | ROHRING Anna | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
51 | HWANG Chanel | 100% | 91% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
52 | LI Yixin Catherine | 100% | 54% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
53 | LI Xiang (Shining) | 100% | 35% | 3% | - | - | - | |
54 | SATISH Prisha | 100% | 30% | 3% | - | - | - | |
55 | TSIPORUKHA Sasha | 100% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - | |
56 | BHARADWAJ Aadya | 100% | 92% | 56% | 12% | 1% | - | |
57 | LAW Casey | 100% | 97% | 56% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
58 | LAWRENCE Nia | 100% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
59 | SMITH katherine | 100% | 96% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.