The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SRIVATSAV Ishaan | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 41% | 21% | 2% |
2 | SRIVATSAV Anay | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | - |
3 | ZHAO Aidan | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
3 | VENKATRAMAN Sushil | - | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% |
5 | BELHE Hridhaan | - | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
6 | HERNANDEZ Sierra | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 8% |
7 | FLORES Mateo Pakal | 1% | 11% | 40% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
8 | LEE Laon | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
9 | LIN Avery | 1% | 6% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
10 | HOFFMAN Remus | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 8% |
11 | THOMAS Liam | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
12 | MAO Ruier | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
13 | WANG James | 9% | 43% | 34% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
14 | TANG Athena | 47% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.