Meadowlands Expo Center - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TSUI Natalie | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% | |
| 2 | WEI Vivian W. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
| 3 | MCKEE Brynnley | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 39% |
| 3 | CHEN Jessica | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% | |
| 5 | SO Catelyn | - | - | - | 5% | 21% | 43% | 31% |
| 6 | NAYAK Esha | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 40% | 19% | 3% |
| 7 | CHIARELLI Valentina | - | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% |
| 8 | LAURI Keira | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 9 | ZHANG Sophie | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
| 10 | LIGH Erenei J. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 39% |
| 11 | FAVO Isabella | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 12 | WEI JoyAnn | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 5% | |
| 13 | SCHAIBLE Sofia L. | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
| 14 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 4% |
| 15 | GUGALA Hanna | 2% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 16 | CANSECO Carly | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 17 | GOMERMAN Sophia | - | - | 3% | 19% | 41% | 32% | 4% |
| 18 | SOURIMTO Valeria | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 52% |
| 19 | MAKLIN Sofia | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 42% | 18% | |
| 20 | ZENG Sarah | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 13% | |
| 21 | LIU Yifei | - | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 34% | 10% |
| 22 | CHIANG Melissa | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 23 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 45% |
| 24 | MALEK Zolie | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 6% |
| 25 | PAUL Lila | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% |
| 26 | MONTORIO Lily M. | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
| 27 | MCKEE Ainsley | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
| 28 | DEHON Inès | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
| 29 | DHAR Layla | - | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 30 | KNOBEL Sophia | 3% | 14% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 5% | - |
| 31 | DAI Olivia | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | |
| 32 | WANG yining | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 36% | 10% |
| 33 | XIAO julie | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 44% |
| 34 | FESTA Carina | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 42% | 32% |
| 35 | MARYASH Samantha | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 27% |
| 36 | MUND Ruth | - | 1% | 4% | 16% | 32% | 34% | 14% |
| 37 | KANDADAI Lara | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 38 | CAO Sophie | 1% | 10% | 37% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 39 | MEDVINSKY Alexandra | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 7% |
| 40 | ZHOU Ruoxi ( Jasmine) | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 41 | DONG Angel | - | - | 4% | 23% | 41% | 27% | 5% |
| 42 | MAGITSKY Leila | 25% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | SPEARS Mya B | - | 7% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 4% | |
| 44 | SHINCHUK Ellisha | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% | |
| 45 | REN Xinling | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 3% |
| 46 | LEUNG Ashlyn K. | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 47 | PABIAN Emilia | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 48 | BUSH Bethany | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 49 | FENG Alicia G. | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 50 | ZHENG Valentina | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 50 | FREEMAN Armine | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 52 | WENG Amber | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 53 | CHAVAN Arya | - | 11% | 40% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 54 | MURRAY Audrey A. | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 55 | CHOU Zoe | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 34% | 11% | 1% |
| 56 | LOO Kaitlyn | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% | |
| 57 | BAWA Anahat | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% | |
| 58 | HUANG Rachael | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 9% |
| 59 | LOURENCO Alexandra | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 60 | YOUNG Audrey | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 39% | 16% | 1% |
| 61 | CHAN Madeleine V. | 3% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 62 | MARGULIAN Maria | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 63 | KAPLAN Gabriela | 4% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 64 | NAYAK Anika | 3% | 27% | 41% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 65 | CHI Claire | 10% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 66 | PADANILAM Lily | 26% | 40% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 67 | BERMAN Greta | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 10% | |
| 68 | SRINATH Lyra A. | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 69 | MANI Francesca B. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 8% |
| 70 | BIBLER Anna | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 71 | BORGUETA Madison | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 72 | MERCHANT Aishwarya | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 72 | LATYSHAVA Stephanie | 4% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 74 | PROZUMENT Elizabeth | 11% | 53% | 30% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 75 | PALMIERI Giuliana M. | 19% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 76 | TA-ZHOU Emma | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 77 | LI Sonia | 11% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 77 | BOLT - TURNER Carmen | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 79 | CROOKS Riley | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 80 | HORVITZ Jacqueline | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 81 | LI Alexis | 3% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 82 | WOTZAK Kaia | 5% | 27% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 83 | LEE Tammy | 26% | 47% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 84 | KALINICHENKO Yekaterina | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 84 | NAYAK Antara | 34% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 86 | CHO Kaeli M. | 31% | 46% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 87 | LIM Alexa J. | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 88 | XU Demi | 73% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 89 | KHOST Maeve | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 90 | BAIREDDY Maya | 20% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 91 | ZHENG Sophia | 8% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 92 | ONG Lauren | 38% | 48% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 93 | SULLIVAN Siobhan | 53% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 93 | ROHATGI Saanvi | 70% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 95 | BAIK Madeline | 73% | 25% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.