Meadowlands Expo Center - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | XIAO julie | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 65% |
2 | TSUI Natalie | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 59% |
3 | MCKEE Brynnley | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% |
3 | SPEARS Mya B | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
5 | MUND Ruth | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
5 | FAVO Isabella | - | - | 4% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% |
7 | WEI JoyAnn | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 26% |
8 | CAO Sophie | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
9 | BERMAN Greta | - | - | 1% | 13% | 42% | 44% | |
10 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 26% |
11 | LIU Yifei | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 18% |
12 | CHIANG Melissa | - | - | 5% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 6% |
13 | CHIARELLI Valentina | - | - | - | 3% | 21% | 46% | 29% |
14 | HUANG Rachael | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 14% |
15 | GUGALA Hanna | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
16 | WU Yuwei | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 5% |
17 | GUVEN Coco | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 28% | 5% |
18 | DONG Angel | - | - | - | 5% | 21% | 42% | 31% |
19 | KURAEVA Vasilisa | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% | |
20 | PROBASCO Leila | - | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% |
21 | PABIAN Emilia | - | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 18% |
22 | DHAR Layla | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
23 | DAMBAL Sasha | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 2% |
24 | ZENG Sarah | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 22% |
25 | MALEK Zolie | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 32% | |
26 | DAVIDOVA Kira | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | |
27 | MEDVINSKY Alexandra | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% | |
28 | SO Catelyn | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 48% |
29 | LEE Alyson | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% |
30 | ZHOU Ruoxi ( Jasmine) | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 3% |
31 | YOUNG Audrey | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% | |
32 | MEYERSON Michelle | 8% | 28% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
33 | SCHAIBLE Sofia L. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% |
34 | TA-ZHOU Emma | 1% | 10% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - |
35 | FABRICANT Kioka R. | 1% | 8% | 31% | 40% | 17% | 2% | |
36 | MERCHANT Aishwarya | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | |
37 | KNOBEL Sophia | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
38 | CHAN Madeleine V. | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
39 | BUSH Bethany | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 39% | 30% | 5% |
39 | HU Anna | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
41 | CROOKS Riley | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
42 | MANI Francesca B. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
43 | LOO Kaitlyn | - | 1% | 4% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 9% |
44 | LAURI Keira | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
45 | LI Sonia | - | 5% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
46 | FENG Alicia G. | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 45% | 16% | |
47 | LEOU Korina | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% | |
48 | HAMMERSTROM Aria | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% |
49 | DEHON Inès | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% |
50 | TENG EMMA | - | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% |
51 | HORVITZ Jacqueline | 10% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
52 | CHANG Elle | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 8% | - |
53 | WENG Amber | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 4% | - |
54 | KOHLBERGER Noelle | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 47% | 27% |
55 | PADANILAM Lily | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
56 | CHAVAN Arya | - | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
57 | BERRIOS Catalina | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
58 | FUNG Iris | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | |
59 | CANSECO Carly | - | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
60 | ALAMI Amira | 12% | 37% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
61 | BROWN Aria | 8% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
62 | KWON Ava | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 3% |
63 | RANJAN Diya | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
64 | FOSS Persephone | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
65 | HUANG Doris | - | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
66 | BORGUETA Madison | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 2% |
67 | LATYSHAVA Stephanie | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% | |
68 | ZHANG Emily | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 1% | |
69 | SHMULER Fiona | 6% | 31% | 38% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
70 | FREEMAN Armine | - | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% |
71 | SRINATH Lyra A. | - | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
72 | STADNIK Emilia | 1% | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
73 | XU Demi | 13% | 40% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
74 | LIM Alexa J. | 8% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
75 | CHI Claire | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
76 | GONZALEZ Veronika | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
77 | BLAKE Anna | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 13% | |
78 | LIANG Claire | 2% | 18% | 41% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
79 | MANSPERGER Gia | 6% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - | |
80 | KALINICHENKO Yekaterina | - | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% | - |
81 | KHOST Maeve | 3% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
82 | HILD Anya | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
83 | PASUPULETI Laya | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
84 | BAIREDDY Maya | 6% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
85 | DUTA Lyra | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
86 | SEVASTOPULO Sahra | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
87 | DHAR Rana | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | |
87 | WANG JiaQi | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | |
89 | ENG Madeleine | 15% | 44% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | |
90 | KWON Ava | 36% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | |
91 | PROZUMENT Elizabeth | 5% | 23% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
92 | GUHA Surabhi | 6% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
92 | CHANG Norah | 12% | 39% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
94 | LOURENCO Alexandra | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
95 | MACKAY Katherine | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
96 | PALMIERI Giuliana M. | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
97 | MERMEGAS Olivia | 3% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
98 | UEMOTO Lynn | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
99 | LEE Andrea | 11% | 36% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
100 | SHAPLEN Alexandra | 9% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
101 | MAGITSKY Leila | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
101 | KITSON Sasha | 35% | 43% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
103 | HUANG Eleanor | 48% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
104 | SONG Emily | 41% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
105 | ROHATGI Saanvi | 30% | 44% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
106 | LEE Tammy | 27% | 43% | 24% | 6% | - | - | - |
107 | KESSLER Amelia | 44% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
108 | WONG Charlene | 11% | 38% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
108 | KIM Audrey | 74% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
110 | GENTILE Vittoria | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
111 | BIBLER Anna | 10% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
111 | LEE Kaitlin | 17% | 49% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
111 | VISWANATHAN Nishka | 41% | 42% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
114 | BHARDWAJ Riya | 43% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
115 | FUNG Maya | 57% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.