Meadowlands Expo Center - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | GU Sarah | D D V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.7 | 4 | -1.7 |
2 | YIN Julia | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
3 | KRUMHOLZ Nicole | V V D V D V | V V V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
3 | GUJJA Misha | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
5 | SMOTRITSKY Mia | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
6 | QI Jarynne Valerie | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
7 | HAFEEZ Hania | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
8 | RAKHOVSKI Alexandra | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
9 | KHARCHYNA Polina | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
10 | LEE Scarlett | V V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
11 | ZHU Serene M. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
12 | PRIHODKO Nina | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
13 | CAFASSO Natalya | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
14 | GORNOVSKY Abigail | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
15 | NGUYEN Kira | V D V V V V | V V D | 5.7 | 5 | -0.7 |
16 | SU Evelyn | V D V V D D | V V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
17 | SMUK Alexandra S. | V V V V D V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
17 | AZMEH nour | V V D V V V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
19 | RANDLEMAN Teresa | D V V V V V | V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
20 | REMEZA Alissa | V V D V V V | V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
21 | BASRALIAN Azniv | D V V V V | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
22 | NOVOJILOV Anastasia | V V D V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
23 | SHU Youshan | V V V D V D | V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
24 | SONG Angela | D V V D V V | V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
24 | JUDICKE Olivia | D D V V V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
26 | MISHIMA Audrey | D V V V D V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
27 | LI Zhenni (Jenny) | D V D V V V | V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
28 | FENG Iris | V D D V V V | V D | 1.6 | 4 | +2.4 |
29 | LI Fei | V V V D D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
30 | FURMAN Maria | V D V V D | V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
31 | SOBUS Yanka | D D V V V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
32 | YOU Isabel B. | D D V V D V | V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
33 | BENZAN India | V V D V V D | D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
34 | JI Catherine | V V V V D D | D | 1.5 | 4 | +2.5 |
35 | BRUNSON Nile | D V V D V V | D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
36 | NGUYEN Ashley L. | V D V D V V | D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
37 | LIN Elaine | V V D V D V | D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
38 | LIU Baihan | D V D V V V | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
39 | KUMAR Anusha | V V D V D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
40 | KUMAR Eva | V V D D D V | D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
41 | LEE Claire | V V D D D V | D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
42 | FANG Jocelyn | D V V D V D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
43 | MOYSTON Elizabeth | D D V V V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
43 | YANG Charlotte | V V D D V D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
45 | CHUANG Ramona | D D D V V V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
46 | TANG RUIRUI | V D D V D V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
47 | SUN Zeyu | V V V D D D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
48 | KOVALCHUK Erika S. | V D V D V D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
49 | ILYAS Ayah | D V V D D V | V D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
50 | WAN Runxi | V V D D V D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
51 | GLAZ Alison | V D V V D D | V D | 0.8 | 3 | +2.2 |
52 | YOU Emily | V D V D D | V D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
53 | CASHMAN Amanda | V D D V D | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
54 | IYER Ishana | V D V D D D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
55 | JUN Bomie | D D D V D V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
56 | PINNAMANENI Drithi | D V V D D D | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
57 | MEYER Rachel | V D D D V D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
58 | WANG Sijia | D D D V V D | D | 0.5 | 2 | +1.5 |
59 | BO GENESIS | D D V V D D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
60 | COLELLA Lauren | D V D V D D | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
60 | SAZONOVA Alexandra | D D V D V D | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
62 | PANG Ashley | V D D V D D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
63 | ZHANG Mingmeng | D V D D D D | V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
64 | LY Hannah | D D D V D D | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
65 | SHANKERDAS Shreeya | V V D D V D | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
66 | PAN Angela | D V V D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
67 | FANG Kayla | D D V D V D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
68 | CHEN Alicia | D D V D D V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
69 | ZUCKER Emily A. | D V D V D D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
70 | MURPHY Katherine | D D D D V V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
71 | COSTA Leah | D D D D V | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 | |
72 | GAO Audrey | D D D D V | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
73 | LIU Charlotte | D D D D V | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
74 | HOM Justina | D V D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
75 | MEYER Rebecca | D D D D V D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
76 | BARDIN Kira | V D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
77 | ELKHATEEB Fajr | D V D D D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
78 | WONG HIN SANG Annabelle | V D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
79 | SATO Elyse | D D D D V D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
80 | HOAGLAND Sally | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
81 | CHANG Chloe | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
82 | ANAR Yesugen | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
83 | MELLEBY Georgia | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
84 | FANG jenna kim | D D D D D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 | |
85 | ANAR Yesui | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
85 | LEEB Zoe | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
87 | THOMAS Rhiana | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
87 | SANTORO Chloe | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.