Meadowlands Expo Center - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 65% |
| 2 | KURAEVA Vasilisa | - | - | 3% | 20% | 44% | 33% |
| 3 | MEYERSON Michelle | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 10% |
| 3 | DAVIDOVA Kira | 1% | 9% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 3% |
| 5 | WU Yuwei | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 33% | 8% |
| 6 | LEE Alyson | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 42% | 18% |
| 7 | GUGALA Hanna | - | - | 2% | 18% | 47% | 33% |
| 8 | TENG EMMA | - | - | 3% | 22% | 48% | 27% |
| 9 | HUANG Doris | - | - | 2% | 15% | 48% | 36% |
| 10 | WANG JiaQi | 2% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% |
| 11 | LEOU Korina | - | - | 3% | 19% | 46% | 32% |
| 12 | GONZALEZ Veronika | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 23% |
| 13 | HU Anna | - | - | 4% | 21% | 47% | 28% |
| 14 | DHAR Rana | - | 2% | 16% | 45% | 31% | 6% |
| 15 | FUNG Iris | - | - | 2% | 17% | 49% | 32% |
| 16 | MARAGH Farrah E. | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% |
| 17 | BUSH Bethany | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
| 18 | KWON Ava | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% |
| 19 | VINOKUR Anita | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 26% |
| 20 | DAMBAL Sasha | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 41% | 17% |
| 21 | PARK Haylie | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 2% |
| 22 | BERRIOS Catalina | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
| 23 | BLAKE Anna | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 40% | 17% |
| 24 | ZHANG Ashley | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 25 | MERZLYAKOVA Maria | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% |
| 26 | MACKAY Katherine | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 27 | DUTA Lyra | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 28 | GONG Joy | - | 2% | 17% | 39% | 32% | 9% |
| 29 | BAIK Sarah | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 30 | BORGUETA Madison | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 14% |
| 31 | LIANG Claire | 2% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 32 | FOSS Persephone | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
| 33 | MULLER Inara | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% |
| 33 | IANNUZZI Lucy | - | 6% | 28% | 45% | 18% | 2% |
| 35 | NIU Jessica | 2% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 36 | ALMEDA Galina | 6% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 37 | HILD Anya | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 38 | SEVASTOPULO Sahra | 6% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 39 | CHOI Charlotte | 2% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 40 | MAK Kaitlin | 17% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 41 | WEI Madison | 3% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 42 | XU Elaine | 12% | 40% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 43 | LI Tiffany | 4% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 44 | CHANG Norah | 6% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 45 | YERENKOVA Ameliia | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 46 | WANG Emily | 7% | 30% | 43% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 47 | BROWN Aria | 8% | 34% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 48 | BLUMBERG Harper | 39% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 49 | MERZLYAKOVA Alexandra | 19% | 43% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 50 | SUN Yi | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% |
| 51 | REDA Sophie | - | 6% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 4% |
| 52 | SONG Emily | 22% | 46% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 53 | REN Katherine | 3% | 24% | 41% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 54 | DEMRY Kylee | 20% | 46% | 29% | 4% | - | - |
| 55 | WANG Chloe | 42% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 56 | LEE Kaitlin | 28% | 50% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 57 | WONG Charlene | 29% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 58 | CONVERSO-PARSONS Maia | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 59 | MARGULIS Roxana | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 60 | LEIGH Adalene | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 60 | PRUTSKY Alexandra | 19% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 62 | LOCHRIDGE Leah | 30% | 46% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 63 | STEVENS Ashelin | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 64 | STOLCKE Saskia | 39% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 65 | PIENKOWSKI Olivia | 44% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 66 | BAK Milena | 19% | 45% | 30% | 5% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.