The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | KER Grace | - | - | 1% | 6% | 32% | 61% |
| 2 | XIONG Haojiao | - | - | 5% | 24% | 43% | 26% |
| 3 | YAO Rainie | 2% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 3 | MULAGARI Sadhika | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 43% | 13% |
| 5 | TSE Angelina | - | - | 1% | 9% | 39% | 51% |
| 6 | HUAI Delilah | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% |
| 7 | DIECK Miranda P. | 2% | 14% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 2% |
| 8 | SCHMIDT Isabel | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 34% | 6% |
| 9 | MANN Sophia J. | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 9% |
| 10 | JIANG Mu Jia (Michelle) | 5% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 11 | GAUTAM Sahana | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 9% |
| 12 | STONE Coral | 4% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 13 | TAN Adelyn | 4% | 24% | 41% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 14 | DANG Kelia | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% |
| 15 | FENG Alicia G. | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 7% | - |
| 16 | XA-CHIN Sara | 7% | 33% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 17 | PYO Penelope E. | 4% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 18 | KIM Elyssa | 32% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 19 | ZHOU Ruoxi ( Jasmine) | 9% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 20 | HU Michelle | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% |
| 21 | SAWANT Asmi | 52% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 22 | IYER Arushi | 25% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 23 | GOSAVI Aabolee | 19% | 43% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 24 | HUSS Miriam | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.