Northern Virginia Knights RYC/RJCC

Youth 14 Men’s Foil (Y14MF)

Sunday, May 4, 2025 at 8:00 AM

Register

Michael and Son Sportsplex at Dulles - Sterling, VA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1963 2071 - 1750
5 - 8 1650 1792 - 1476
9 - 16 1572 1971 - 1403
17 - 26 1134 1353 - 630

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Huynh, Matthew Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. D24 2029 1776.10
2 Tarchichi, Robby Pittsburgh Fencers Club D25 2071 1739.89
3 Liu, Alex AIC Fencing Club E25 2001 1736.47
4 Bowles, Kevin Apex Fencing Academy U 1750 1411.01
5 Ramesh, Prashvin Apex Fencing Academy D25 1792 1382.36
6 Shaw, Spencer Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. E24 1619 1348.40
7 Tarchichi, Daniel Pittsburgh Fencers Club U 1714 1249.66
8 Hoare, Gabriel Masters Fencing Club U 1476 1179.01
9 Weber, Andrew Chesapeake Fencing Club E24 1686 1171.32
10 Hua, Isaac AIC Fencing Club U 1499 1160.03
11 Huynh, Kaleb Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. U 1414 1150.66
12 Jiang, Bohan AIC Fencing Club U 1500 1139.14
13 Han, Nathan Apex Fencing Academy U 1480 1116.93
14 Tucker, Nechiga Research Triangle Fencing U 1625 1087.25
15 Stansbury, Desmond OnTarget Fencing Club E25 1403 1039.87
16 Itwaru, Logan OnTarget Fencing Club U 1971 998.36
17 Chenutula, Abhinav OnTarget Fencing Club U 1353 900.57
18 Chen, Ethan AIC Fencing Club U 1325 858.30
19 Robertson, Liam Birmingham Fencing Club U 1235 766.17
20 Parmar, Veer AIC Fencing Club U 1335 751.03
21 Huang, Anthony AIC Fencing Club U 1147 747.62
22 Pack, Lindsey OnTarget Fencing Club U 1218 688.43
23 Dalal, Amitav Orlando Fencing Academy U 1084 498.26
24 Xu, Ryan AIC Fencing Club U 1164 324.07
25 Chen, Tyler Orlando Fencing Academy U 849 < 0
26 Mack, Julian OnTarget Fencing Club U 630 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!