Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | STAMOS Maria | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 41% |
2 | JING Alexandra | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 26% |
3 | GAYDOS Sofia C. | - | 5% | 18% | 31% | 29% | 14% | 3% |
3 | KOKES Gabrielle | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 33% | 32% | 12% |
5 | HOOSHI Erica S. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% |
6 | THOMPSON Julia T. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 37% |
7 | HO Brianna W. | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
8 | KIM Lauren Hyomin | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
9 | SERBAN Samantha M. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 13% |
10 | VEERKAMP Molly | - | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
11 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 26% |
12 | MOLHO Sofia | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
13 | STEWART Isabella A. | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
14 | JING Emily | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
15 | MAROTTA Veronica L. | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
16 | SADAN Jordan E. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
17 | KIM Rachael | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 5% |
18 | SCHATZ Kristina J. | 1% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
19 | BOODELL Ella | - | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
20 | XU Christine | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
21 | LIAO Lu Jia (Lucy) | - | 5% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 2% |
22 | ZHENG Ivy | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 5% |
23 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
24 | YUGOV Elizabeth (Liz Yugov) | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
25 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | - | 5% | 20% | 32% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
26 | NARANG Maya | 6% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
26 | LUNG Katerina | 1% | 7% | 22% | 32% | 25% | 10% | 2% |
28 | PO Edith | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
29 | LI Meilin | - | 5% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 3% |
30 | CHEN Kelly | - | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
31 | WONG Julia M. | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
32 | HOLLE Aviella S. | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
33 | CHO Lorin Y. | 7% | 38% | 37% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
34 | HU Ally | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
34 | KANIUK Rachel | 29% | 43% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
36 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | 10% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
37 | LEE Alison | 13% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
38 | HUANG Natalie | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
39 | DAVIDSON Sammy C. | 11% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
40 | FELLMAN Sara | 78% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
41 | LEE Alyssa W. | 37% | 40% | 18% | 4% | 1% | - | - |
42 | BHOGAL Sukhneet | 71% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.