Baltimore, MD - Baltimore, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | HENRY Asha S. | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 32% | 33% | 13% |
2 | BELSLEY Devon K. | - | - | 6% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 4% |
3 | GLASSNER Sophia Rose S. | - | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
3 | WANG anne | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 6% |
5 | DUNSEATH Lauren M. | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 36% |
6 | KIM Caroline | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | |
7 | TOLBA Salma | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% | |
8 | ALLEN Susan B. | - | 6% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - |
9 | KIM Elizabeth Y. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 14% |
10 | OGAWA Kaylin | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
11 | YAO Jillian | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 40% | 17% |
12 | EBRAHIM Ameera H. | 3% | 16% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 3% | - |
13 | OAKE Erica | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
14 | JACKSON Wilma S. | 8% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 8% | 1% | - |
15 | WUNDERLICH Cara J. | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | |
16 | VALLURI Rithi H. | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
17 | COOPER Tina M. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
18 | BOWIE Charlotta | 9% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% | |
19 | BISEN Shivani S. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
20 | BUCKLES Alexis A. | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
21 | GERTISER Amalie (Amy) C. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
22 | ALLI Sofia | 5% | 21% | 34% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
23 | CORDERO Allison | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | |
24 | ZENG Jiawen | 1% | 9% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
25 | BEDKER Alisa | 8% | 32% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
26 | THOMAS Angeline | 61% | 34% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
27 | MURRELL Jessica L. | 13% | 36% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.