Birmingham Jefferson Convention Complex - Birmingham, AL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | SHENG Dalton | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
2 | ZHAO Adam | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
3 | SENIC Lucas | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
3 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
5 | TANG Alexander L. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
6 | ZHANG Lucas | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
7 | PARRISH Evan | V V V V V D | V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
8 | FEDELI Francesco | V V V D V V | V V V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
9 | ZHAO Nathan | V V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
10 | GUTH Joseph | D V V V V V | V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
11 | DESERANNO Leander | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
12 | DENG David | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
13 | ELKOUSY Zain al Din | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
14 | MANDZY Theodor | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
15 | DOELL Ethan | V V V V D | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
16 | MARISI Gabriel | V D V V D V | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
17 | DHOKTE Neev | V D D V V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
18 | GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas | V V V D D V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
19 | OZAWA Taishi | V V D V V D | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
20 | QIAN Henry | V V D V V D | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
21 | KIM Andrew | V V D V V D | V D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
22 | SUAREZ David | V V D V D D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
23 | YOON Junhyeok | D D D V V V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
24 | GE Felix Fei | D D V D V V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
25 | FANG Haoyu | D D V V D V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
26 | SHAW Spencer | V V D D D V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
27 | LIM EUNSEONG | D D V D V V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
28 | LU Hansen | D V D V D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
29 | ALKADI Zain | D V D V D V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
30 | HUYNH Matthew | D V D D V V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
31 | ZHENG Marcus | V D V D D D | V D | 4.3 | 2 | -2.3 |
32 | KOE Declan | D D D V D D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
33 | ZHOU Alex | V D V D V | D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
34 | GUO Joey | D V V V D D | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
35 | SHAW eric | D V D V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
36 | FRASER Rhys | D V V D D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
37 | PARK Jubin | D V D D V D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
38 | JEONG David | D V D D V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
39 | ZENG Albert | V D D D V D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
40 | FULLER Myles | D D D D V V | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
41 | HEARN Asa C. | D D D V D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
42 | WANG Caleb | D D V D D V | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
43 | WENGER Rowan | D D D D V | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
44 | MAZAHERI Theodore | D D D V D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
45 | LESTER Ashton | D D D V D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
46 | BABER Shaheer | V D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
47 | ALKADI Deen | D V D D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
48 | BRIDGES Henry | D D V D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
49 | WENGER Liam | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
50 | CHOI Junwoo | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
51 | JONES Gideon | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
52 | CHIANG Aiden | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
53 | NELSON Palmer | D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
54 | ROBERTSON Liam | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
55 | ZHANG Justin | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.