Baltimore, MD - Baltimore, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ADEL Ali | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 53% | |
| 2 | KAUFMAN Bradley A. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
| 3 | CHEN Howard | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 19% | |
| 3 | CHAMBERS Amir E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 40% | 8% |
| 5 | HAMMER Peter A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 21% |
| 6 | DANNULL Lukas J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 11% | |
| 7 | PENTON Robert | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 8 | DU Gavin J. | 100% | 86% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 9 | RIGGINS Littleton K. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 15% | |
| 10 | BENAVRAM Lev C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
| 11 | DANNULL Linus N. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 48% | 9% | |
| 12 | CHEN Brian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 77% | 43% | 11% |
| 13 | HENDERSON James C. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 14 | HAZLE-CARY Jacob P. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 8% | |
| 15 | LAU Jeremy Y. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 16 | MATT Chris | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 49% | |
| 17 | MORRIS Samuel A. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 18 | WOODWARD Dylan P. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 55% | 22% | 4% | |
| 19 | GILMORE Thomas W. | 100% | 99% | 84% | 44% | 10% | 1% | |
| 20 | BOHRA Rohan | 100% | 89% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 21 | GANTA Vijay | 100% | 81% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 22 | MORREALE John | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% | 22% | 3% | |
| 23 | BUKOWSKI Bronson | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% | |
| 24 | CHIN Matthew W. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
| 25 | YAO Jonathan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 17% | 2% | |
| 26 | HUDDY Brandon J. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
| 27 | LEONARD Cole | 100% | 95% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 28 | PATRICK Timothy M. | 100% | 94% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 29 | PAN Andrew W. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 30 | WU Nicholas R. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% | |
| 31 | STONE Christopher A. | 100% | 91% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 34 | CRUZ-BARBEN Julian | 100% | 88% | 55% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 35 | ROPER Evan C. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 22% | 4% | |
| 36 | SMITH IV Edward (Ted) A. | 100% | 71% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
| 37 | LEE Jude H. | 100% | 75% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | MOORE Evan M. | 100% | 73% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.