GRAFA RYC\RJCC\ROC - Third Coast Cup 2025

Division II Women’s Epee (DV2WE)

Saturday, March 15, 2025 at 3:00 PM

Register

MSA Sports Spot - Grand Rapids, MI

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2346 2869 - 1884
5 - 8 1921 2170 - 1791
9 - 16 1606 1813 - 1466
17 - 25 1239 1614 - 863

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Norconk, Claire Traverse City Fencing Club C24 2869 2449.11
2 Schultz, Gillian Hooked On Fencing C24 2543 2236.60
3 Swenson, Alexandra Ataba Fencing Club C23 2088 1733.32
4 BARANOSKI, CHLOE Grand Rapids Fencing Academy C24 1884 1546.21
5 Bartoszuk, Camilla Fencing Center Of Chicago D24 1809 1485.06
6 Schliep, Anna Center for Blade Arts E24 1791 1455.40
7 Burkhardt, Krista Ataba Fencing Club E24 1913 1413.64
8 Gugino, Esmeralda West Michigan Fencing Academy E24 2170 1366.67
9 DePauw, Adeline Traverse City Fencing Club E24 1813 1363.38
10 Fang, Jocelyn E24 1722 1301.74
11 Chan, Macie Windy City Fencing-Chicago E24 1633 1275.82
12 Rafferty, Catherine Olympic Fencers Club D24 1612 1239.96
13 Widmann, Ceili Michigan State University Fencing Club U 1600 1112.40
14 Guska, Jenn Royal Arts Fencing Academy E24 1466 1100.50
15 Trusevich, Kate Grand Rapids Fencing Academy E24 1513 992.86
16 Hart, Jenna Davis Fencing Academy of Miami U 1487 958.50
17 Culver, Hannah Center for Blade Arts E25 1425 927.23
18 Dunne, Jessica Rockland Fencers Club E23 1230 804.86
19 Trusevich, Natasha Grand Rapids Fencing Academy U 1556 790.98
20 Tisdale, Zaria Bronzeville Fencing Academy U 1080 574.82
21 Groce, Linda Stoccata Fencing Academy & Club U 1149 556.04
22 Zeno, Vivian Grand Rapids Fencing Academy U 863 265.91
23 Reese, Lauren Northwest Indiana Fencing Club U 1222 < 0
24 Saylor, Ashley Traverse City Fencing Club U 1614 < 0
25 Hewitt, Lisa Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy U 1014 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!