Birmingham Jefferson Convention Complex - Birmingham, AL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | YE Eric | - | - | 1% | 10% | 41% | 47% |
| 2 | SHANKWILER Christopher | - | 1% | 15% | 38% | 35% | 11% |
| 3 | WANG Justin | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 22% |
| 3 | SO Preston | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 18% |
| 5 | KUMAR Arjun | 1% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 6 | LI AYDEN | - | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
| 7 | VAID Luke | - | - | 6% | 27% | 43% | 24% |
| 8 | BELL III Alfred (Tripp) R. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% |
| 9 | HUNG Samuel | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
| 10 | LI linze | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 12% |
| 11 | CHAMBERS Miles | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% |
| 12 | XU Ivan | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 13 | HALL Noah | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% |
| 14 | NOTOPRADONO Nicholas | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 15 | LIU Victor | - | 2% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 8% |
| 16 | HUO Ethan | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
| 17 | SRIVATS Vedh | - | 3% | 23% | 41% | 27% | 6% |
| 18 | GONG Gavin | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 19 | LIM Kai | 2% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% | 1% |
| 20 | XIA Matthew | 13% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 21 | KURILO Michael | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% |
| 22 | YE Ivan | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 14% |
| 23 | FANG Eason | - | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 8% |
| 24 | BAGHERI Bijan | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 25 | ALMEDA Stanislav | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 26 | PINTO Marcus | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 47% | 19% |
| 27 | LIU Ethan | 12% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 28 | HUANG Jason | 49% | 43% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 29 | KIM Samuel | 2% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 30 | LIU Aaron | 14% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 30 | NAMBIAR Navin | 56% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | BARRY Dave | 38% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 33 | KUMAR Avinash | 3% | 20% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 34 | CHEN Allen | 37% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 35 | TUNIK Joshuah | 17% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 36 | KOTVALI Aneesh | 32% | 54% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.