Birmingham Jefferson Convention Complex - Birmingham, AL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TANG Owen S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 55% |
| 2 | QIAN Jason H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% |
| 3 | SENIC Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 13% |
| 3 | SHENG Dalton | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 19% |
| 5 | WONG Garrick G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% |
| 6 | WANG Brayden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 7% |
| 7 | LORENZO Alejandro | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 7% |
| 8 | HEARN Christen J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 51% | 10% |
| 9 | MATSAKH Philip | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 17% |
| 10 | ZOU Yuming | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 24% | 3% |
| 11 | GUTH Joseph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 7% |
| 12 | LEVY Jacob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 36% | 5% |
| 13 | ZHAO Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 7% |
| 14 | DE COQUET Maximilian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% | 3% |
| 15 | FEDELI Francesco | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 13% |
| 16 | TWEMLOW Sacha | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 14% | 1% |
| 17 | JURMAN Therin | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 18 | MOE Annan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 8% | 1% |
| 19 | ZHANG Lucas | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 20 | DENG David | 100% | 98% | 80% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 21 | GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 22 | LU Nathan | 100% | 94% | 61% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 23 | FAN Yuchen | 100% | 96% | 72% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 24 | LEVY rex | 100% | 84% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 25 | KOE Beckett | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 26 | DING Tommy | 100% | 96% | 71% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 27 | JOHNSON Soren | 100% | 93% | 63% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 28 | THIYAGARAJAA Ari | 100% | 94% | 62% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 29 | DONG Joshua | 100% | 79% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 30 | ELKIN David | 100% | 96% | 73% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 31 | REDONDO Tomas D. | 100% | 65% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 32 | ZHANG Bryan | 100% | 40% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 33 | KIMURA Ryo | 100% | 53% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 34 | GADIYARAM Madhav | 100% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 35 | SU Daniel | 100% | 56% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.