Windy City Fencing ROC/RJCC

Division IA Men’s Saber (D1AMS)

Saturday, April 19, 2025 at 8:30 AM

Register

The Berto Center / Known as Old Bulls traing center - Deerfield, IL

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2785 3116 - 2490
5 - 8 2152 2249 - 2007
9 - 16 1889 2194 - 1694
17 - 28 1734 2148 - 1425

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Murzyn, CJ Lawrence University Fencing NCAA C22 2789 2468.32
2 DeCesaris, Charles RedStar Fencing Club Chicago C24 3116 2390.34
3 Wang, Max Midwest Fencing Club B24 2490 2226.60
4 Zayas, Devin Phoenix Fencing Academy C24 2744 1957.68
5 Faridi, Imran Ohio Fencing Center C25 2226 1899.38
6 Brockmeyer, Tyler Fence St. Louis D24 2249 1846.51
7 Wagner, Elijah RedStar Fencing Club Chicago D24 2125 1809.13
8 Parkila, Lukas Renaissance Fencing Club D24 2007 1749.08
9 Pei, Anthony C24 2194 1730.20
10 Perry, Gwydion Renaissance Fencing Club C24 1911 1610.18
11 Lin, Patrick Midwest Fencing Club E25 1916 1582.02
12 Turner, Benjamin Midwest Fencing Club D24 1864 1553.21
13 Naftali, Ori Midwest Fencing Club D25 1837 1525.27
14 Zhu, Matthew Midwest Fencing Club D25 1866 1521.49
15 Hibino, Uta RedStar Fencing Club Chicago E24 1828 1468.75
16 Barrows, Hunter Midwest Fencing Club E25 1694 1414.85
17 Dega, Brandon Madison Fencing Academy E25 2148 1372.97
18 Sun, Andy Manitoba Golden Blades U 1791 1368.92
19 Clark, Brandon Renaissance Fencing Club U 1730 1308.84
20 Ramani, Ari Renaissance Fencing Club E25 1607 1241.64
21 Twemlow, Sacha Midwest Fencing Club E24 1799 1240.11
22 Kavzan, Toprak US Sabre Academy D25 1760 1168.29
23 Fine, Mark Midwest Fencing Club E25 1961 875.27
24 Edinberg, Azra E24 1756 777.73
25 Guziec, Robert Midwest Fencing Club U 1425 775.24
26 Wengerhoff, Daniel U 1835 87.31
27 De Witt, Magnus U 1448 < 0
28 Ktsanes, Charlie Fencing Illini, University of Illinois U 1551 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!