Bucks County Academy of Fencing - Lambertville, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | MOLCHAN Yury | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 2 | CHAWLA Armaan | V V D V V | V V V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 3 | MATTO Edward J. | D V V V V | V V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 3 | DACKO Alexander V. | V V D V V D | V V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 5 | DURKIN Tristan E. | V V V V V | V V D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
| 6 | O'DOWD Andrew J. | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 7 | BARREIRO Darren | V V D V V V | V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 8 | SHULKIN Mark | D V D D V | V V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 9 | BUSH Thomas | V V V V D D | V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 10 | CHEN Leonardo | V D V V D V | V D | 1.1 | 4 | +2.9 |
| 11 | UPSHAW Micah | V D V V D | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 12 | COX Matthew T. | V D D V V | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 13 | TOMASZEWSKI Joshua | V V V D D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 14 | RIDGE John (Drew) A. | D V V V D | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 15 | MCDERMOTT Brian | V V D V D | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 16 | LIOU Solomon | D V D V D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 17 | SAFKO Jeffrey A. | V V D D V V | D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 18 | ROLANDO Doc | D V V D V V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 19 | SERAFIN Ben | D V V V D | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 20 | NEALE James H. | V D D V V | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 21 | LATORA Nicholas A. | D V V D V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 22 | COTLAR Andrew D. | V D D V V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 23 | POWELL Zachory B. | V D V D V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 24 | GAMBINO Robert A. | D V V D V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 25 | COETZEE Frans M. | D V D V D V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 26 | KURPASKA Jonathan A. | D V V D D V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 27 | MALHAM Andrew | D D V D D V | V D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 28 | SOKOL Luke | V D D D D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 29 | FLINT James E. | V D D D D | V D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 30 | KIRSCH Adam J. | D D D D V D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 31 | NELSON Tennyson | D D D V D D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 32 | TOMASZEWSKI Trevor | D D D D D D | V D | 2.6 | 0 | -2.6 |
| 33 | BLAKESLEE Garrett H. | D D V D V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 34 | MAHALINGAM Nikhil | D D V D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 35 | TOMASZEWSKI Simon | D D V D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 36 | SHAH Viraj | D D D D V | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 37 | TKACH Robert W. | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 38 | BRYKCZYNSKI James V. | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.