UNG - Gainesville, GA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | CHUNG Joshua Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 2 | RACHEL Dylan | V | V V | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 3 | JUNG Elliot Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 3 | URBANSKI Logan | V | V V | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 5 | SWARTZ Emile | V D | 0.0 | 0 | - | |
| 6 | BUZINKAI Brennan | D | 0.0 | 0 | - | |
| 7 | RIGGINS Joshua Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 8 | KIM Daniel Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 9 | KRIEGER Jack | V | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 | |
| 10 | CHOI Adam Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 11 | HAN Ethan | D | V D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 12 | YE Nong Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 13 | PLUMLEE Kaben Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 14 | ROBERTS Quinton | D | 0.0 | 0 | - | |
| 15 | THOMAS Ethan | D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
| 16 | ANDERSON Pierson Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 17 | ZHU Kelvin Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 18 | LAWSON Cavin Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 19 | MULLINAX William Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 20 | OSAGIE Simon Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 21 | PLAVICH Nathan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 22 | PAK Joel Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 23 | MILLER Nick Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 24 | POWERS Nathan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 25 | YANG Chris | D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 26 | HONG Ryan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 27 | CHOI Caister Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 28 | ANDRADE Christopher Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 29 | HOLDO Adrian Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 30 | ROBINSON Avery Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 31 | MONROE Robert Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 32 | YANG Yuwei Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 33 | CHOI Ethan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 34 | RIVERA Eli Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 35 | DALTON Andrew Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.