Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SHOMAN Jenna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 82% |
| 2 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 22% |
| 3 | ENGELMAN-SANZ Madeline A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% |
| 3 | GHAYALOD reya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 35% |
| 5 | MIKA Veronica | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 45% |
| 6 | NATHANSON Sammy E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 7% |
| 7 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 48% |
| 8 | NGUYEN Siena | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 9 | PAUL Lila | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 37% | |
| 10 | MARYASH Samantha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 20% | 2% |
| 11 | WEI Vivian W. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 5% |
| 12 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% |
| 13 | JUNG Irene | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 20% |
| 14 | ZHANG XUANYI | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 13% | |
| 15 | SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% |
| 16 | ERIKSON Kira R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 45% | 11% |
| 17 | HWANG Gabriela M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 34% |
| 18 | YANG Ashley M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 25% |
| 19 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 20% |
| 20 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 15% |
| 21 | YANG Angelina LeLe | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 16% | |
| 22 | LIM Jaslene | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 1% |
| 23 | JEONG Katie | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 51% | 20% | 3% |
| 24 | SHI Cathleen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 14% |
| 25 | VADASZ Ibla P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% |
| 26 | LIU Sophie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% |
| 26 | SENOGLU Irmak | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 44% | 16% | 2% |
| 28 | ALCEBAR Kayla | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
| 29 | JOHNSON Lydia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
| 30 | SO Catelyn | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 4% |
| 31 | SINHA Anika | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 32% | 6% |
| 32 | WANG Gloria | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 33 | LI Amanda C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 59% | |
| 34 | MCKEE Brynnley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 37% | 3% |
| 35 | LIGH Erenei J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
| 36 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 35% | 6% |
| 37 | LEE Hannah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 35% |
| 38 | KHAN Alissa | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 39 | KIM Marley I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 22% |
| 40 | FERREIRA Alejandra E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 5% |
| 41 | CHEN Ashley | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
| 42 | TSUI Natalie | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
| 43 | LIU Yifei | 100% | 100% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 44 | KER Grace | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% |
| 45 | XIAO julie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 14% |
| 46 | YU Zhiang | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 13% | 2% |
| 47 | GRAFF Sophie | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 48 | YOUNG Audrey | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 49 | YAO Rainie | 100% | 92% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 50 | WU Helen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 40% | 11% |
| 51 | NATH Trisha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 15% |
| 52 | ZHOU Ruoxi ( Jasmine) | 100% | 83% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 53 | HILD Nisha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 47% | |
| 54 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA | 100% | 98% | 82% | 43% | 9% | 1% | |
| 55 | BOYNTON Ainsley | 100% | 84% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 56 | BAWA Anahat | 100% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 57 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
| 58 | FEIG Sela | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 59 | MANSPERGER Leena | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 14% | 1% |
| 59 | MALEK Zolie | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 61 | ZHANG Chenfei | 100% | 94% | 64% | 24% | 3% | - | |
| 62 | CHRISTOTHOULOU Olympia C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
| 63 | BUHAY Kirsten M. | 100% | 97% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 64 | STONE Coral | 100% | 88% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 65 | CHIN Sophia J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% |
| 66 | LU Elaine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 52% | 14% |
| 67 | CHUNG Hailey | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 68 | PENG Florella | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 69 | YUAN Greta | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 41% | 10% |
| 70 | CHIARELLI Valentina | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
| 71 | DUCKETT Madison | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 36% |
| 72 | ZHAO Emily W. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 73 | MARGULIAN Maria | 100% | 88% | 51% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 74 | WANG yining | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 16% | 1% |
| 75 | BARNOVITZ Maya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 34% | 2% |
| 76 | SCOTT Eve | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 77 | SPEARS Mya B | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 77 | CHO Michelle | 100% | 99% | 85% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 79 | MEDVINSKY Alexandra | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 80 | HUAI Delilah | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
| 81 | DONDERIS Katherine | 100% | 94% | 68% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 82 | SOURIMTO Valeria | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 14% | |
| 83 | DAI Olivia | 100% | 98% | 75% | 31% | 6% | - | |
| 84 | LUKER Sophia | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 84 | CHANG Audrey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 19% | 1% |
| 86 | CHEN Jessica | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 87 | VINOGOROVA Sofiia | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 88 | ARNOLD Hali | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 41% | 14% | 2% |
| 89 | MULAGARI Sadhika | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 90 | DANG Kelia | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 91 | SULLIVAN Madilyn R. | 100% | 79% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 92 | HU Michelle | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 2% |
| 92 | LI Jiaying | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 94 | TAN Adelyn | 100% | 91% | 59% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 95 | FESTA Carina | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
| 96 | MUND Ruth | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 33% | 5% | |
| 97 | LEE Sophia | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
| 98 | CHAPMAN-LAYLAND Astrid M. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 55% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 99 | TONG Jessie | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 100 | LI YING CHU | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 101 | HENRY Soraya S. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 102 | WANG Zidan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 102 | CHIANG Melissa | 100% | 95% | 69% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 104 | DUDNICK Morgan | 100% | 79% | 42% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 105 | GRULICH Rayaana | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 106 | XU Emily T. | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 107 | KUANG TongFei | 100% | 99% | 86% | 50% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 108 | DONG Angel | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 109 | BUSH Bethany | 100% | 99% | 82% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 110 | DE SILVA Augusta | 100% | 79% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 111 | GAUTAM Sahana | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 112 | FANG Sophie | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 113 | MAGITSKY Leila | 100% | 69% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 114 | LEE Lauren | 100% | 97% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 115 | WEI JoyAnn | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 115 | ZOLLER Noelle | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 117 | HAMBAZAZA Liisa | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 117 | MAKLIN Sofia | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 117 | LAGOON Miriam | 100% | 87% | 54% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 120 | TURIANO Nadelle | 100% | 66% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 121 | KANDADAI Lara | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 122 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 10% | 1% | |
| 123 | GOLDIN Nina | 100% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 124 | DIECK Miranda P. | 100% | 97% | 61% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 125 | REGANTI Sitara | 100% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 125 | SHINCHUK Ellisha | 100% | 96% | 70% | 29% | 5% | - | |
| 127 | FENG Alicia G. | 100% | 99% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 128 | NAYAK Esha | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 129 | JEFFORDS Sophia | 100% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 130 | MCKEE Ainsley | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 131 | LIN Nicole | 100% | 98% | 72% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 132 | STRIZHEVSKY Ariel | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 133 | TREACY Aisling | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 134 | YANG Lea | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
| 135 | NEUMAN Ella | 100% | 74% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 136 | CHEN Kevy | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 137 | LIU Sydney | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 138 | KIM Elyssa | 100% | 51% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 139 | BOLTON Eleksi M. | 100% | 81% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 140 | LOMOTAN Addison | 100% | 84% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 141 | CHAVAN Arya | 100% | 98% | 83% | 44% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 142 | SULLIVAN Siobhan | 100% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 143 | HITOMI Nadya | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 144 | LOPEZ-ONA Mia | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 145 | BROWNER June | 100% | 78% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 146 | GOURNEAU Sophie L. | 100% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 146 | FLATT Sophia | 100% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 148 | KONNIKOV Esther E. | 100% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 149 | AMELANG Raquel | 100% | 61% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 150 | SAAD Alia | 100% | 63% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 151 | CHAN Kayla | 100% | 50% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.