Baltimore, MD - Baltimore, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KULKARNI Diya | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 42% | 15% | |
2 | LEE Michelle | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% | |
3 | MARCHANT Sandra M. | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% | |
3 | TONG Sarah Shen | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
5 | LAWSON Marie A. | - | - | 3% | 12% | 30% | 37% | 18% |
6 | PATURU Meghana | - | - | 2% | 17% | 45% | 36% | |
7 | PYO Yunice | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% | |
8 | KIM Caroline | 1% | 10% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
9 | IGOE Nirali B. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
10 | KUZNETSOV Victoria | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 14% | |
11 | RABEL Brenna V. | 2% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 14% | 2% | |
12 | ZHANG Maya | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% | |
13 | QUINLAN Nicole P. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% | |
14 | HENRY Asha S. | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 10% |
15 | BELSLEY Devon K. | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
16 | JOHNSON Ryleigh E. | 2% | 14% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 5% | 1% |
17 | KHAMIS Yasmine A. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 22% | 76% |
18 | KANG Dahyun | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | |
19 | NI Emma | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 10% |
20 | BISEN Shivani S. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
21 | LEE Kyungmin | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 42% | 14% | |
22 | YAO Jillian | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
23 | KIM Elizabeth Y. | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% | 1% |
24 | LEE Olive | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 1% | |
25 | DUNSEATH Lauren M. | - | - | 4% | 22% | 45% | 29% | |
26 | LONG Cindy | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% | |
27 | LORENTSON Dawn M. | 11% | 37% | 35% | 14% | 3% | - | |
28 | PROKOP Jeannine A. | - | 5% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
29 | WANG anne | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 10% | 2% |
31 | HUH Anna | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 24% | 6% | - |
32 | SIBLEY Elisabeth J. | 2% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 2% | - |
33 | BOWIE Charlotta | 19% | 44% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | |
34 | MENDEZ Melissa J. | 8% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
35 | CHAWLA Ishika | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
36 | SHI Angela L. | 17% | 43% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
37 | TOLBA Salma | 12% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - | |
38 | OGAWA Kaylin | 2% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% | |
39 | GIFFORD Sally | 21% | 44% | 28% | 6% | - | - | |
40 | CHOI Yuni D. | 25% | 44% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
41 | COOPER Tina M. | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
42 | CORDERO Allison | 30% | 41% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
43 | GORDON Rachel A. | 25% | 41% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - | |
44 | ROWLAND May | 38% | 41% | 17% | 4% | - | - | - |
45 | RIOS Donna B. | 58% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.