National Championships and July Challenge (Summer Nationals)

Division IA Women’s Foil (D1AWF)

Tuesday, July 1, 2025 at 12:00 AM

Register

Baird Center - Milwaukee, WI

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2768 3246 - 2565
5 - 8 2554 2573 - 2529
9 - 16 2303 2501 - 2115
17 - 24 1917 2120 - 1643

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Zhang, Alina Tim Morehouse Fencing Club (Port Chester) A24 3246 2987.31
2 Biodrowicz, Julia RedStar Fencing Club Chicago B24 2664 2404.44
3 Marisi, Gianna Lang Fencing Academy B24 2595 2332.95
4 Castaneda, Keira Silicon Valley Fencing Center B25 2565 2311.40
5 Babiac, Julia Fencing Academy Of Westchester A25 2573 2306.44
6 Ren, Kayley Silicon Valley Fencing Center B25 2550 2293.41
7 Chang, Elizabeth Orange County International Fencers Club B23 2529 2275.67
8 Troxel, Sylvie Rain City Fencing Center C24 2565 2256.78
9 Joo, Natalie Top Fencing Club A25 2501 2250.87
10 Wynn, Kylie Golubitsky Fencing Center C24 2398 2138.25
11 Hafez, Tahiyah AIC Fencing Club C25 2340 2087.91
12 Zhang, Ivy LA International Fencing B25 2299 2048.45
13 Dimatulac, Elise Ann V Fencing Club B25 2255 2002.95
14 Xie, Su Silicon Valley Fencing Center C25 2272 1992.94
15 Kim, Sydney Elite Fencing Club C25 2241 1986.54
16 Urdaneta Largura, Sylvia RedStar Fencing Club Chicago C25 2115 1844.67
17 Cao, Kayla Research Triangle Fencing C24 2035 1771.61
18 Harris, Parker Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy B25 1971 1695.36
19 Owen, Ashley Ohio Fencing Center D24 2120 1692.62
20 Taylor, Gabrielle Northwest Fencing Center D25 1990 1688.77
21 Fellman, Sara Brooklyn Fencing Center C24 1999 1541.03
22 Chang, Nola Space City Fencing Academy E24 1818 1477.55
23 Campbell, June Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy E24 1760 1477.51
24 Shin, Jaelynn Metro Tacoma Fencing Club D24 1643 1323.74

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!