National Championships and July Challenge (Summer Nationals)

Veteran 50-59 Women’s Saber (V50WS)

Thursday, July 3, 2025 at 12:00 AM

Register

Baird Center - Milwaukee, WI

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 3081 3489 - 2697
5 - 8 2605 2657 - 2538
9 - 16 2311 2611 - 2135
17 - 24 1680 1966 - 1163

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Seal, Julie Valkyrie Fencing Club A23 3489 3121.64
2 Kalkina, Yelena Oregon Fencing Alliance C25 3217 2813.23
3 Denner, Jasmina Scarsdale Fencing Center C24 2920 2613.50
4 Sierra, Kate Wagner College NCAA C25 2697 2404.95
5 Altman, Leigh Globus Fencing Academy C23 2582 2316.80
6 Foley, Eileen Denver Fencing Center C23 2643 2310.39
7 Wilson, Dawn Louisville Fencing Center, Inc. D23 2657 2278.39
8 Oblonsky, Natalia Manhattan Fencing Center C23 2538 2225.18
9 Enochs, Liz United Fencers of Oakland C23 2558 2203.77
10 Willemse, Jamie PDX Fencing C24 2397 2087.10
11 Lim, Nona United Fencers of Oakland C24 2611 2012.67
12 Jean, Emmanuelle Texas Fencing Academy C23 2199 1872.64
13 Dreyer, Nadia Nova Fencing Club C23 2203 1851.55
14 Dudnick, Shannon Fencing Academy Of Denver D25 2166 1778.86
15 Lapp, Laurie Traverse City Fencing Club U 2222 1755.35
16 Ambalong, Jody Premier Fencing Academy C24 2135 1636.64
17 Feitler, Sarah Fencing Academy Of Denver U 1852 1371.20
18 Dubrovina, Irene Epee Miami Fencing Club E25 1871 1362.98
19 Johnson, Pamela Louisville Fencing Center, Inc. E25 1826 1316.56
20 Webb, Maud Globus Fencing Academy E24 1637 1264.81
21 Gomes, Gisela Spartak U 1966 1226.13
22 Pein, Annette Zeta Fencing U 1477 767.55
23 Hirsch, Lauren Renaissance Fencing Club U 1163 545.87
24 Hicks, Corlis U 1650 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!