New Orleans, LA - New ORleans, LA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | CHIZ Max H. | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 17% | |
| 2 | KRAEMER Craig | - | 4% | 27% | 48% | 20% | |
| 3 | SMITH Andrew | - | 5% | 25% | 46% | 24% | |
| 3 | DAVIS Campbell | - | - | 6% | 25% | 44% | 25% |
| 5 | VAN BEEK Garrett | 6% | 27% | 42% | 23% | 3% | |
| 6 | EGGERS Kurt | - | 5% | 31% | 41% | 20% | 3% |
| 7 | COCHRAN Michael | - | - | 1% | 13% | 42% | 44% |
| 8 | FRANZNICK Charles (Charlie) W. | 1% | 13% | 42% | 35% | 9% | |
| 9 | WELDON Benjamin | - | 2% | 18% | 40% | 32% | 8% |
| 10 | JONES Ross | - | 3% | 19% | 41% | 32% | 4% |
| 11 | MA Bochen | - | 2% | 18% | 45% | 34% | |
| 12 | O'CONNOR Ryan (Ryan O'Connor) D. | - | 3% | 24% | 42% | 26% | 5% |
| 13 | CORNWELL Sean M. | 3% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 14 | DAVIS Richard M. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 2% |
| 15 | SCHWARY Irv | 15% | 41% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 16 | RUNGE Patrick A. | 37% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 17 | GILMORE Bryan | 55% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 18 | GUERRA Stephen | 20% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
| 19 | FERNANDEZ Christopher | 18% | 55% | 24% | 3% | - | |
| 20 | HVIDING Ketil | 32% | 46% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 21 | RAY William | 19% | 42% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
| 22 | GUIDANGEN Jason | 14% | 39% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.