Fortune ROC/RJCC/RYC

Cadet Men’s Foil (CDTMF)

Monday, September 1, 2025 at 8:00 AM

Register

Ontario Convention Center - Ontario, CA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2444 2493 - 2402
5 - 8 2285 2336 - 2257
9 - 16 2067 2234 - 1897
17 - 24 1530 1826 - 1241

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Park, Rion Massialas Foundation (M Team) B25 2493 2237.26
2 Kim, Daniel Silicon Valley Fencing Center B25 2449 2196.34
3 Chang, Jonathan Silicon Valley Fencing Center B24 2433 2180.91
4 Li, Richard Silicon Valley Fencing Center B25 2402 2151.56
5 Park, Steve (Sangmin) Golubitsky Fencing Center B25 2336 2081.11
6 Zhou, Ryan Silicon Valley Fencing Center B25 2287 2032.45
7 Zhong, Maxwell Silicon Valley Fencing Center B24 2259 2005.91
8 Zhou, Shawn LA International Fencing B25 2257 2002.06
9 Yang, Charles Silicon Valley Fencing Center C24 2234 1983.65
10 Li, Lucas Orange County International Fencers Club D24 2183 1926.14
11 Park, William Massialas Foundation (M Team) D24 2095 1837.38
12 Ong, Nicholas Elite International Fencers Club D25 2080 1823.27
13 Li, Daniel Team Touche Fencing Center C25 2086 1804.83
14 Yang, Steve Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 2004 1748.98
15 Yue, Jackson Silicon Valley Fencing Center C24 1959 1701.54
16 Wu, Gengze (Daniel) Orange County International Fencers Club U 1897 1641.88
17 Zhan, Kevin Golubitsky Fencing Center D24 1826 1535.60
18 Zhang, Yankai LA International Fencing U 1769 1496.24
19 Wong, Braxton Massialas Foundation (M Team) D25 1788 1473.77
20 Karpman, Benny LA International Fencing U 1520 1148.56
21 Cheung, Henry Maximum Fencing Club U 1349 1010.93
22 Trujillo, Jonah United Fencing Academy E25 1395 1004.82
23 Yung, Brandon Golubitsky Fencing Center U 1350 950.15
24 Shadravan, Arash LA International Fencing U 1241 630.59

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!