Premier Challenge ROC/RJCC/RYC

Cadet Men’s Epee (CDTME)

Sunday, September 28, 2025 at 2:00 PM

Register

Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2658 2981 - 2392
5 - 8 2105 2281 - 2008
9 - 16 1914 1987 - 1851
17 - 26 1653 1873 - 1246

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Mao, Benjamin Medeo Fencing Club A25 2981 2725.12
2 Mitev, Alexander Windy City Fencing-Chicago A25 2721 2465.71
3 Kim, Henry New York Fencing Academy A25 2537 2281.24
4 Singleton, Aman Olympia Fencing Center A25 2392 2139.73
5 Luo, Alexander New Jersey Fencing Alliance C25 2281 2023.06
6 Szczapa, Lukas Vivo Fencing Club D25 2098 1817.34
7 Glushkov, David Olympia Fencing Center B25 2008 1733.36
8 Hennessy, Levon Rockland Fencers Club C24 2032 1733.32
9 Parigian, Alexander Vivo Fencing Club E25 1987 1658.82
10 Solarz, Arthur Fencing Academy Of Westchester D25 1938 1643.94
11 Nool, Alexander Wanglei International Fencing Club C25 1857 1601.49
12 Tu, Jinqi C24 1982 1592.41
13 Chen, Evan Shoreline Fencers Club D25 1866 1591.20
14 Zheng, Jason Cavalier Fencing Club E25 1851 1582.87
15 Zhao, Pierce New York Fencing Academy D25 1898 1581.35
16 Thomas, Andrew Medeo Fencing Club E25 1933 1572.55
17 Chen, Tianjun Cavalier Fencing Club E25 1835 1566.82
18 Lychko, Maksym Medeo Fencing Club C24 1873 1564.37
19 Song, Changze Cavalier Fencing Club B25 1840 1563.33
20 Bhandare, Veer Fencing Academy Of Westchester U 1822 1545.50
21 Wang, Charles Medeo Fencing Club D24 1781 1409.83
22 Thomas, Ethan Medeo Fencing Club D25 1673 1252.50
23 Chen, Cameron Shoreline Fencers Club D25 1539 1026.66
24 Chen, Jayden New York Fencing Academy U 1359 1008.66
25 Suh, Aiden Olympia Fencing Center U 1563 827.50
26 O'Brien, Michael Rockland Fencers Club U 1246 134.56

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!