Richmond Fencing Club - Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | SMITH V Edward (Quin) A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 81% | |
| 2 | DUELL Jacob P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 85% |
| 3 | O'DONNELL Breck | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% |
| 3 | ROUNTREE Rob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 91% | 45% | |
| 5 | PEZZAT Daniel S. | 100% | 92% | 58% | 16% | 1% | |
| 6 | FORMY DUVAL Christopher | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 34% | 6% |
| 8 | SEMP Iain | 100% | 97% | 75% | 30% | 2% | |
| 9 | CROWDER Andrew E. | 100% | 93% | 64% | 22% | 2% | |
| 10 | PRICE Owen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 71% | 12% | |
| 11 | TETTERTON Jr Joseph S. | 100% | 87% | 50% | 14% | 1% | - |
| 12 | EATON David | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 13% | |
| 13 | SEMP Brannon A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% | 6% |
| 14 | ZIMSKY James | 100% | 95% | 72% | 31% | 5% | - |
| 15 | HARPER Wesley | 100% | 85% | 43% | 9% | - | |
| 16 | DYER John G. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 40% | |
| 17 | MAGGY Melanie D. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
| 18 | ISAACSON Bjorn | 100% | 92% | 51% | 12% | 1% | |
| 19 | BIELEWICZ Nicholas | 100% | 92% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 20 | MORRIS Luke | 100% | 83% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 21 | TREADWAY Ella | 100% | 35% | 3% | - | - | |
| 22 | ROUNTREE Andrew | 100% | 56% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 23 | HARTMAN Grayson | 100% | 90% | 58% | 20% | 2% | - |
| 25 | LARSON Winston | 100% | 70% | 26% | 4% | - | |
| 26 | SNELL Angelina | 100% | 89% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 27 | HUEY Curtis E. | 100% | 92% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 29 | HANSON Beckett | 100% | 88% | 42% | 4% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.