Neil Lazar Div1/Div2/Veteran ROC

Veteran Men’s Foil (VETMF)

Sunday, August 24, 2025 at 8:00 AM

Register

Southern Connecticut State University (James Moore Fieldhouse) - New Haven, CT

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 3472 3911 - 3232
5 - 8 2886 3096 - 2585
9 - 16 2244 2466 - 1891
17 - 23 1826 2265 - 1373

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Wyszynski, Marek Fencers Club Inc. A25 3911 3561.58
2 Jan, Stephen A25 3452 3035.25
3 Cho, Michael Renaissance Fencing Club A25 3232 2917.36
4 Epply-Schmidt, Paul Bucks County Academy Of Fencing A23 3295 2891.43
5 Lawrence, John Masters Fencing Academy NJ A22 3095 2772.09
6 Pavlovich, Robert Fencers Club Inc. B22 3096 2475.53
7 Flanagan, James Youth Enrichment League Fencing Club B25 2769 2458.77
8 Cheng, Thomas Stoccata Fencing Academy & Club U 2585 2074.20
9 Dorfman, Mitchell Morris Fencing Club C25 2401 2034.44
10 Riffaterre, Jason Yorkville Arms Fencing Club C25 2447 1866.89
11 Rolando, Doc Masters Fencing Academy NJ C22 2466 1865.97
12 Kurpaska, Jonathan Bucks County Academy Of Fencing C25 2368 1734.76
13 Viveros, Oscar On Point Fencing Club E25 2005 1704.13
14 Turdo, Mark Bucks County Academy Of Fencing - West C24 2427 1660.31
15 Rusanov, Oleg Royal Fencing Academy D22 1891 1589.49
16 Mastronardi, Joseph Worcester Fencing Club C24 1947 1539.77
17 Gonzalez, John Yorkville Arms Fencing Club C24 2255 1519.98
18 Crowder, Andrew Rhode Island Fencing Academy And Club C24 1957 1454.69
19 Pho, Eric Fencers Club Inc. D24 2265 1441.72
20 Springer, Michael LEO Fencing Club U 2125 669.96
21 Greenleaf, John Fencers School Of Connecticut U 1427 658.78
22 schneiderman, todd Medeo Fencing Club U 1381 389.87
23 Botwinick, Nelson Fencers Club Inc. U 1373 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!