Louisville, KY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GU Sarah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 25% |
| 2 | PARK Faith K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% |
| 3 | HUSISIAN Hadley N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% |
| 3 | GANDHI Sedna S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 32% |
| 5 | WU Fan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 7% |
| 6 | CHIN Isabella | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 37% |
| 7 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 15% |
| 8 | LU Junyao | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 23% | 3% |
| 9 | OXENREIDER Tierna A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 53% |
| 10 | MACHULSKY Leehi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% |
| 11 | MAO Amy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 9% |
| 12 | XIAO Ruien | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 12% |
| 13 | JOYCE Michaela | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% |
| 14 | TYLER Syd | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 25% | |
| 15 | LUO Ashley | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 5% |
| 16 | KORFONTA Jolie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% |
| 17 | MILLETTE Marie Frederique | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 27% |
| 18 | KIM Zoe L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% |
| 19 | WANG Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% |
| 20 | XUAN Nicole J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 10% |
| 21 | KETKAR Ketki | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% |
| 22 | O'DONNELL Amanda A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% |
| 23 | HU Grace | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 31% |
| 24 | CAPELLUA Mariasole | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 18% | 2% |
| 25 | SEBASTIAN Felicity A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% |
| 26 | NING Emma | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% |
| 27 | YAO Melinda | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% |
| 28 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 55% | 17% |
| 29 | LIN Jessica Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% |
| 30 | WITTE Vera | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
| 31 | MCLANE Lauren | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 13% |
| 32 | MEHROTRA Anya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% |
| 33 | KHAMIS Yasmine A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% |
| 34 | DAMRATOSKI Anna Z. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
| 35 | LEE Michelle J. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 26% | ||
| 36 | YIN Julia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
| 37 | KIM Jayna | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 38 | TEMIRYAEV Anna M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 25% | 3% |
| 39 | FALLON Kyle R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% |
| 40 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 11% | |
| 41 | CHEN Zhengnan(Janet) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 25% | |
| 42 | LEE Sumin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 33% | |
| 43 | PEHLIVANI Zara | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 15% | 1% |
| 44 | KHARCHYNA Polina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
| 45 | JOYAL Anne-Sophie | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 46 | YU Nicole J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
| 47 | LEE REGINA | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 48 | CALDERA Lexi I. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 15% | 1% |
| 49 | QI Jarynne Valerie | 100% | 99% | 85% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 50 | LEE Olive | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 51 | KUZNETSOV Victoria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 25% |
| 52 | GAO Judy | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 53 | DONDISCH Sophia | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 54 | WATRALL Christina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 42% | |
| 55 | LEE yat ching | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 56 | LAN Alice S. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% | |
| 57 | JAKEL Sophia N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% |
| 58 | KETKAR Mallika | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 8% |
| 59 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
| 59 | LEE Olivia | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 61 | TOLSMA Chloe (CJ) | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 43% | 13% | 1% |
| 62 | SHU Youshan | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 63 | ZHU Chenxi (Heidi) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% |
| 64 | ZIGALO Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 9% |
| 65 | REID Sobia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% |
| 66 | CHENG Ava | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
| 67 | CHERNIS Zoe C. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 68 | NGUYEN Tallulah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% |
| 69 | YANG Alisa | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 70 | LIN Ashley | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 71 | KIM Elizabeth Y. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 72 | NGUYEN Kira | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 28% | 3% |
| 73 | WITTER Catherine A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 15% | 2% |
| 74 | DESAI Meera P. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 75 | ANDERSON Claire | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 76 | SPRINGER Sierra | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 77 | YAO Yilin | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 78 | NOH Rachel | 100% | 9% | - | - | < 1% | - | - |
| 79 | KOZLOWSKI Maya M. | 100% | 98% | 74% | 31% | 5% | - | |
| 80 | SWENSON Nikita G. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 13% | 1% | |
| 81 | SMUK Alexandra S. | 100% | 94% | 67% | 26% | 4% | - | |
| 82 | HICKS Grace | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 83 | CHEN Lefu | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 15% | ||
| 84 | WEBER Nora | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 85 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 16% |
| 86 | PRIHODKO Nina | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 87 | AZMEH nour | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 87 | LI Zhenni (Jenny) | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 89 | MUELLER Emma M. | 100% | 99% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 90 | LU Samantha R. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 6% | 1% |
| 91 | SANTA MARIA Luisa F. | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 91 | ZHOU Wenjun | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 93 | FENG ge | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 93 | SONG Angela | 100% | 97% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 95 | XUE Alanna L. | 100% | 96% | 72% | 30% | 5% | ||
| 96 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | 100% | 94% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 97 | KALE Anika A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 97 | BUSH emma | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 99 | MUN Brianna K. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 99 | WONG Alexandra R. | 100% | 99% | 85% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 101 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
| 102 | CHA Eugenie | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 103 | RUNIONS Emersyn | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 17% | 1% |
| 104 | NGUYEN Audrey | 100% | 89% | 58% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 105 | CANNING Charlotte | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 106 | SHIV Avni | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 106 | CAFASSO Natalya | 100% | 98% | 78% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 108 | DENG Annie | 100% | 83% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 109 | HESS Heidi J. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 110 | MOON Seojung | 100% | 86% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 111 | ZHANG Victoria R. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 112 | YAO KATHARINE | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 113 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 19% | 2% | |
| 114 | KUMAR Eva | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 115 | POIRIER Ariane | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
| 116 | WANG Karen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 11% |
| 117 | WU Amelia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 16% |
| 117 | SU Evelyn | 100% | 100% | 91% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 119 | ALEXANDROV Katherine S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
| 120 | KWON Athina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 14% |
| 120 | PADHYE Tanishka | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
| 122 | PAPADAKIS Lily | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
| 123 | AI Amy | 100% | 98% | 78% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 123 | SENYUVA Su | 100% | 94% | 67% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 125 | MCCUTCHEN Lauren (Lulu) | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 126 | LIU Christina A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 37% | 8% |
| 127 | CARRIER Meredith | 100% | 93% | 61% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 128 | MELLES Anne-Mai | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% |
| 129 | SMOTRITSKY Mia | 100% | 96% | 70% | 28% | 4% | ||
| 130 | HUANG Lanlan | 100% | 96% | 64% | 22% | 3% | - | |
| 131 | RAKHOVSKI Alexandra | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 132 | KOWALSKY Rachel A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% |
| 133 | LONADIER Keira | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 134 | GORNOVSKY Abigail | 100% | 99% | 82% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 135 | SMUK Daria A. | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 136 | LONG Cindy | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 137 | KRUMHOLZ Nicole | 100% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 138 | LI Charlotte | 100% | 88% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 139 | MINOR Lindsey | 100% | 100% | 91% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 140 | REID Anousheh | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 141 | JAKEL Alysa C. | 100% | 96% | 71% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 141 | HONG Elaine | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 143 | SOTELO Michelle | 100% | 95% | 59% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 144 | GUJJA Misha | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% | - |
| 144 | DUMAS Marie | 100% | 89% | 58% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 146 | LIN Elaine | 100% | 97% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 147 | LEE Yedda | 100% | 99% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 147 | KIZILBASH Zara | 100% | 78% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 149 | ABRAMSON Mariela R. | 100% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 150 | BEI Karen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 33% | |
| 151 | SUN MANRONG | 100% | 86% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 152 | ENRILE Erica | 100% | 67% | 23% | 3% | - | - | |
| 153 | KENT Elizabeth J. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 154 | CHIN Sia | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 155 | SEMIKIN Julia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
| 156 | LI Suri | 100% | 81% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 157 | LI Fei | 100% | 92% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 158 | FURMAN Maria | 100% | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 159 | NELSON Grace E. | 100% | 52% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 160 | CHANG Celine A. | 100% | 98% | 63% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 161 | WHITTEMORE Lucy K. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 21% | 2% |
| 161 | YOU Emily | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 161 | LIANG Jingjing | 100% | 66% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 164 | PINNAMANENI Drithi | 100% | 92% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 165 | POTAPENKO Margarita D. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 166 | WANG Nora | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 22% | 4% |
| 167 | HSIU Elizabeth | 100% | 98% | 50% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 168 | ELSTON Sophia | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 169 | YAO Jillian | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 7% | - |
| 170 | RHODY Evalyn | 100% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 171 | FAN Elizabeth | 100% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | ||
| 172 | SINHA Zara | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 173 | DALEY Keira | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 174 | MCKENNA Analise | 100% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 175 | MENDOZA zoie | 100% | 71% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 176 | BENNETT Olivia | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 177 | ESTRADA Ariana | 100% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 178 | MACEY Hadley | 100% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 179 | MAGALSKI Mary | 100% | 49% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 180 | SANTOS Cara | 100% | 54% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 180 | MIHILL Margaret | 100% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 182 | MANAUGH Calliope | 100% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 183 | PERVEZ Zaynab | 100% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 183 | DAVIS Elisabeth | 100% | 12% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.